The following code compiles successfully with g++ 4.8.1:
int main() { int(*)(); }
It looks like a simple declaration of a pointer to function:
int(*f)();
It doesn't compile with clang 3.4 and vc++ 2013.
Is it a compiler bug or one of dark places of the standard?
int(*)();
int(*);
int(*){};
int(*());
Live example with these strange code pieces.
Update 1: @Ali added some interesting information in the comments:
All 4 cases give a compile error with clang 3.5 trunk (202594) and compile fine with gcc 4.9 trunk (20140302). The behavior is the same with
-std=c++98 -pedantic
, except forint(*){};
which is understandable; extended initializer lists only available with-std=c++11
.
Update 2: As @CantChooseUsernames noted in his answer they still compile fine even with initialization and no assembly is generated for them by g++ (neither with nor without initialization) even without any enabled optimization:
int(*)() = 0;
int(*) = 0;
int(*){} = 0;
int(*()) = 0;
Live example with initializations.
Update 3: I was really surprised to find that int(*)() = "Hello, world!";
compiles fine, too (while int(*p)() = "Hello, world!";
doesn't compile, of course).
Update 4: It is fantastic but int(*){} = Hello, world!;
compiles fine. And the following extremely strange piece of code, too: int(*){}() = -+*/%&|^~.,:!?$()[]{};
(live example).
Update 5: As @zwol noted in his comment
This and a number of related syntactic problems are being tracked as gcc bug 68265.
According to the C++ Standard (p. #6 of section 7 Declarations)
6 Each init-declarator in the init-declarator-list contains exactly one declarator-id, which is the name declared by that init-declarator and hence one of the names declared by the declaration
So it is simply a compiler bug.
The valid code could look as for example (apart from the function pointer declaration showed by you) though I can not compile it with my MS VC++ 2010.
int(*p){};
It seems that the compiler you are using for testing allows declarations without a declarator-id.
Also take into account the following paragraph of section 8.1 Type names
1 To specify type conversions explicitly, and as an argument of sizeof, alignof, new, or typeid, the name of a type shall be specified. This can be done with a type-id, which is syntactically a declaration for a variable or function of that type that omits the name of the entity.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With