I want to use a WebSocket to transfer binary data, but you can only use WebSockets to transfer UTF-8 strings.
Encoding it using base64 is one option, but my understanding is that base64 is most desirable when your text might be converted from one format to another. In this case, I know the data will always be UTF-8, so is there a better way of encoding binary data in a UTF-8 string without paying base64's 33% size premium?
This question is mostly academic, as binary support will probably be added to WebSocket eventually, and base64 is a perfectly cromulent alternative in the meantime.
You could use a Base-128 encoding instead of a Base-64 encoding. That will only result in an overhead of 1/7 in opposite to 1/3.
The idea is to use all Unicode code points that can be represented in a single byte in UTF-8 (0–127). That means all bytes begin with a 0
so there are seven bits left for the data:
0xxxxxxx
That results in an encoding where 7 input bytes are encoded using 8 output bytes:
input: aaaaaaaa bbbbbbbb cccccccc dddddddd eeeeeeee ffffffff gggggggg output: 0aaaaaaa 0abbbbbb 0bbccccc 0cccdddd 0ddddeee 0eeeeeff 0ffffffg 0ggggggg
So the output to input ratio is 8/7.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With