Here are the facts that I have in my knowledge base (http://www.doc.gold.ac.uk/~mas02gw/prolog_tutorial/prologpages/recursion.html (Recursion Exercise 2)):
taller(bob,mike). % bob is taller than mike
taller(mike,jim). % mike is taller than jim
taller(jim,george). % jim is taller than george
Now I want to use recursion to deduce something that is obvious "bob" is taller than "george".
I tried to add this rule to solve this:
taller(X,Y) :- taller(X,Z),taller(Z,Y).
I need your help to make a stop condition to this recursion because now I have a stack overflow error:
| ?- taller(bob,george).
Fatal Error: local stack overflow (size: 8192 Kb, environment variable used: LOCALSZ)
Thanks
The problem is that your recursive taller/2
predicate is defined as:
taller(X,Y) :-
taller(X,Z),
taller(Z,Y).
As a result, a taller/2
predicate can always result in two new taller/2
predicates on the "call stack" so to speak, and this nesting can go on and on.
A way to handle this is separating the knowledge from the transitive closure. By defining an is_taller/2
predicate, that calculates the transitive closure of the taller/2
predicate like:
is_taller(X,Y) :-
taller(X,Y).
is_taller(X,Y) :-
taller(X,Z),
is_taller(Z,Y).
Now there is "guaranteed progression" so to speak, because each time the is_taller/2
is called, it will make a call to taller/2
. Since taller/2
has no recursion, the number of possible answers is limited. Since taller/2
is a strict order relation, eventually we will reach the shortest person, and thus the backtracking will get exhausted.
So the full code should be:
taller(bob,mike). % bob is taller than mike
taller(mike,jim). % mike is taller than jim
taller(jim,george). % jim is taller than george
is_taller(X,Y) :-
taller(X,Y).
is_taller(X,Y) :-
taller(X,Z),
is_taller(Z,Y).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With