What's is wrong with the following code:
#include <ctime>
#include <vector>
#include <utility>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
std::vector< std::pair< char, unsigned > > vec;
for( unsigned i = 0; i < 100; ++i )
{
char ch = 0;
unsigned number = 0;
do {
ch = i;
number = i;
} while( std::find( vec.begin(), vec.end(), std::make_pair< char, unsigned >( ch, number ) ) != vec.end() );
std::cout << ch << number << '\n';
vec.push_back( std::make_pair< char, unsigned >( ch, number ) );
}
}
It does compile nicely with:
g++ test.cxx
but fails with:
$ g++ -std=c++11 test.cxx /tmp
test.cxx: In function 'int main()':
test.cxx:21:98: error: no matching function for call to 'make_pair(char&, unsigned int&)'
test.cxx:21:98: note: candidate is:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.7/bits/stl_algobase.h:65:0,
from /usr/include/c++/4.7/vector:61,
from test.cxx:3:
/usr/include/c++/4.7/bits/stl_pair.h:268:5: note: template<class _T1, class _T2> constexpr std::pair<typename std::__decay_and_strip<_Tp>::__type, typename std::__decay_and_strip<_T2>::__type> std::make_pair(_T1&&, _T2&&)
/usr/include/c++/4.7/bits/stl_pair.h:268:5: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
test.cxx:21:98: note: cannot convert 'ch' (type 'char') to type 'char&&'
test.cxx:25:69: error: no matching function for call to 'make_pair(char&, unsigned int&)'
test.cxx:25:69: note: candidate is:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.7/bits/stl_algobase.h:65:0,
from /usr/include/c++/4.7/vector:61,
from test.cxx:3:
/usr/include/c++/4.7/bits/stl_pair.h:268:5: note: template<class _T1, class _T2> constexpr std::pair<typename std::__decay_and_strip<_Tp>::__type, typename std::__decay_and_strip<_T2>::__type> std::make_pair(_T1&&, _T2&&)
/usr/include/c++/4.7/bits/stl_pair.h:268:5: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
test.cxx:25:69: note: cannot convert 'ch' (type 'char') to type 'char&&'
SOLUTION:
Instead of explicitly specifying the template arguments to make_pair<>()
this way:
std::make_pair< char, unsigned >( ch, number )
Just let them be deduced:
std::make_pair( ch, number )
EXPLANATION:
The rationale behind this guideline is found in the way std::make_pair<>()
is defined, and in the way template argument deduction works for universal references. From Paragraph 20.3.3/8-9 of the C++11 Standard:
template <class T1, class T2>
pair<V1, V2> make_pair(T1&& x, T2&& y);
Returns:
pair<V1, V2>(std::forward<T1>(x), std::forward<T2>(y));
where V1 and V2 are determined as follows: LetUi
bedecay<Ti>::type
for eachTi
. Then eachVi
isX&
ifUi
equalsreference_wrapper<X>
, otherwiseVi
isUi
. [ Example: In place of:
return pair<int, double>(5, 3.1415926); // explicit types
a C++ program may contain:
return make_pair(5, 3.1415926); // types are deduced
—end example ]
Here, T1
and T2
are meant to be deduced. By explicitly specifying the template arguments yourself, you're getting on the way of make_pair<>()
's type deduction machinery to produce the correct return type, forcing the instantiation of a function which accepts an rvalue reference to char
and and rvalue reference to unsigned
:
... make_pair(char&&, unsigned&&)
However, you are not providing rvalues in input, because ch
and number
are lvalues. This is what the compiler is complaining about.
ALTERNATIVE:
Also notice, that you can implicitly construct an std::pair
object, which saves your from calling make_pair<>()
at all:
vec.push_back( { ch, number } );
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With