I'm creating header-only library and I have to use static member.
Is it possible to define it in the header file without redefinition warning?
Assuming you're talking about a static data member, since a static function member is no problem, there are various techniques for different cases:
Simple integral type, const
, address not taken:
Give it a value in the declaration in the class definition. Or you might use an enum
type.
Other type, logically constant:
Use a C++11 constexpr
.
Not necessarily constant, or you can't use constexpr
:
Use the templated static trick, or a Meyers' singleton.
Example of Meyers' singleton:
class Foo
{
private:
static
auto n_instances()
-> int&
{
static int the_value;
return the_value;
}
public:
~Foo() { --n_instances(); }
Foo() { ++n_instances(); }
Foo( Foo const& ) { ++n_instances(); }
};
Example of the templated statics trick:
template< class Dummy >
struct Foo_statics
{
static int n_instances;
};
template< class Dummy >
int Foo_statics<Dummy>::n_instances;
class Foo
: private Foo_statics<void>
{
public:
~Foo() { --n_instances; }
Foo() { ++n_instances; }
Foo( Foo const& ) { ++n_instances; }
};
Disclaimer: no code touched by a compiler.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With