I've just found this function definition in some embedded code:
float round_float_to_4(static float inputval);
I'm familiar with other uses for static (global variables, functions and local variables), but this is the first time I see it as specifier for function parameter. I assume that this forces compiler to use fixed memory location for inputval instead of stack?
This is non standard. I'd guess the same thing as you, and I'm not surprised of such extension in compilers having an embedded target.
That's not valid. The only valid place where static
may be used in a function parameter i'm aware of is in an array dimension
float round_float_to_4(float inputval[static 4]);
Saying that inputval
will, in all calls to this function, point to memory providing at least 4
floats (this is a C99 addition, it doesn't appear in C89).
As per C standard,
The only storage-class specifier that shall occur in a parameter declaration is register.
Many embedded devices have a seriously limited stack, such a feature would be of great benefit in reducing the chances of stack overflow, while still giving you the opportunity for re entrant code.
Smaller chips don't have any opportunity to put variables on the stack, so all parameters are implicitly memory locations.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With