Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

static_cast and reinterpret_cast for std::aligned_storage

could someone please explain the bit of code about casting in http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/aligned_storage please?

can the following code

return *static_cast<const T*>(static_cast<const void*>(&data[pos]));

be replaced with

 return *reinterpret_cast<const T*>(&data[pos]);

?

Why here two casting are used? Thanks a lot.

Hong

like image 765
hong pei Avatar asked Oct 10 '13 15:10

hong pei


1 Answers

According to the standard (§ 5.2.10 reinterpret_cast, section 7):

A pointer to an object can be explicitly converted to a pointer to a different object type. When a prvalue v of type “pointer to T1” is converted to the type “pointer to cv T2”, the result is static_cast<cv T2*>(static_cast<cv void*>(v)) if both T1 and T2 are standard-layout types and the alignment requirements of T2 are no stricter than those of T1.

Converting a prvalue of type “pointer to T1” to the type “pointer to T2” (where T1 and T2 are object types and where the alignment requirements of T2 are no stricter than those of T1) and back to its original type yields the original pointer value. The result of any other such pointer conversion is unspecified.

So, we could make the following conclusion:

  1. reinterpret_cast<*T>(ptr) is eqiuvalent to static_cast<*T>(static_cast<void*>(ptr))
  2. static_cast<>(ptr) is not always equal to ptr, but reinterpret_cast<>(ptr) is always equal to ptr
  3. if there is no alignment issues, we can use reinterpret_cast safely
like image 184
Yury Bayda Avatar answered Sep 22 '22 05:09

Yury Bayda