I came across the following code in the Ember CLI website:
export default Ember.Helper.helper(function([value]) {
return value.toUpperCase();
});
What confuses me is the square brackets surrounding the value
parameter. I can understand it in a function call, but why in function definition?
A square bracket at one end of an interval indicates that the interval is closed at that end (i.e., the number adjacent to the opening or closing square bracket is included in the interval).
Almost all functions require arguments enclosed in parentheses and separated by commas. If arguments are required, do not place any spaces between the function name and the left parenthesis.
The square brackets tell Python that this is a list comprehension, producing a list. If you use curly braces, you'll get either a set or a dict back, and if you use regular parentheses, you'll get a generator expression (see above).
Square brackets means new Array.
This is a destructuring assignment. The behavior described by @recursive is correct, but it may help to know that it is not limited to the first element. If it had been written with three elements:
function xyz([a, b, c]){...}
Then a, b, and c will all be declared variables available within the function scope, and in this case, would be equal to the first three elements of the array. Further - if the array passed as an argument doesn't have at least three elements, then the remaining elements specified in the parameter (a, b, and c) will exist as being declared, but will have the value of undefined
:
// Example
function destructureThis([a, b, c]){
console.log(a, b, c);
}
var shortArray = [1, 25];
destructureThis(shortArray);
// Prints to console:
// 1 25 undefined
Likewise, if the argument array is larger, additional elements are just ignored, as already noted.
var longerArray = [1, 5, 9, 50, 60];
destructureThis(longerArray);
// Prints to console:
// 1 5 9
Also... this is a recent enough addition to the ECMAScript spec that it should be tested in all your target environments (looking at you IE) if not using Babel or equivalent to transpile it for backwards compatibility.
This is all very surprising to me, but it appears to be valid javascript, according to the ECMAScript 2017 language specification, the formal parameter in a function declaration can any "binding element", including an array binding.
https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#prod-BindingElement
The actual behavior of this feature seems to mean that the argument to the function should be an array, and value
will take on the value of the first element in the array.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With