Here is some example code:
users_groups = Table('users_groups', Model.metadata,
Column('user_id', Integer, ForeignKey('users.id')),
Column('group_id', Integer, ForeignKey('groups.id'))
)
class User(Model):
__tablename__ = 'users'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
class Group(Model):
__tablename__ = 'groups'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
users = relationship('User', secondary=users_groups, lazy='select', backref='groups')
users_dynamic = relationship('User', secondary=users_groups, lazy='dynamic')
So what happens here is that if you add a bunch of users to a group like so:
g = Group()
g.users = [User(), User(), User()]
session.add(g)
session.commit()
and then try to delete the group
session.delete(g)
session.commit()
You will get some form of this error:
DELETE statement on table 'users_groups' expected to delete 3 row(s); Only 0 were matched.
Removing the 2nd version of the relationship (the dynamic one in my case) fixes this problem. I am not even sure where to begin in terms of understanding why this is happening. I have been using 2 versions of various relationships in many cases throughout my SQLAlchemy models in order to make it easy to use the most appropriate query-strategy given a situation. This is the first time it has caused an unexpected issue.
Any advice is welcome.
both the Group.users and Group.users_dynamic relationships are attempting to reconcile the fact that the Group is being deleted along with being able to manage the User()
objects they refer to; one relationship succeeds while the second one fails, as the rows in the association table were already deleted. The most straightforward solution is to mark all but one of the identical relationships as viewonly:
class Group(Base):
__tablename__ = 'groups'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
users = relationship('User', secondary=users_groups, lazy='select', backref='groups')
users_dynamic = relationship('User', viewonly=True, secondary=users_groups, lazy='dynamic')
if you're still wanting to have both relationships handle some degree of mutations, you'd need to do this carefully as SQLAlchemy doesn't know how to coordinate among changes in two relationships at the same time, so conflicts like this can continue to happen (like double inserts, etc) if you make equivalent mutations on both relationships. To just take care of the "delete" issue by itself, you can also try setting Group.users_dynamic to passive_deletes=True:
class Group(Base):
__tablename__ = 'groups'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
users = relationship('User', secondary=users_groups, lazy='select', backref='groups')
users_dynamic = relationship('User', passive_deletes=True, secondary=users_groups, lazy='dynamic')
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With