Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Spring MVC and JSR-303 hibernate conditional validation

I've a form I want to validate. It contains 2 Address variables. address1 has always to be validated, address2 has to be validated based on some conditions

public class MyForm {
    String name;
    @Valid Address address1;
    Address address2;
 }

public class Address {
    @NotEmpty   
    private String street;
}

my controller automatically validates and binds my form obj

@RequestMapping(...)
public ModelAndView edit(
        @ModelAttribute("form")
        @Valid
        MyForm form,
        BindingResult bindingResult,
        ...)

        if(someCondition) {
            VALIDATE form.address2 USING JSR 303

the problem is that if I use the LocalValidatorFactoryBean validator i can't reuse the BinidingResult object provided by Spring. The bind won't work as the target object of 'result' is 'MyForm' and not 'Address'

validate(form.getAddress2(), bindingResult)   //won't work

I'm wondering what's the standard/clean approach to do conditional validation.

I was thinking in programmatically create a new BindingResult in my controller.

final BindingResult bindingResultAddress2 = new BeanPropertyBindingResult(address2, "form");
validate(form.getAddress2(), bindingResultAddress2);

but then the List of errors I obtain from bindingResultAddress2 can't be added to the general 'bindingResult' as the field names are not correct ('street' instead of 'address2.street') and the binding won't work.

Some dirty approach would be to extend BeanPropertyBindingResult to accept some string to append to the fields name.. do you have a better approach?

like image 511
mickthompson Avatar asked Oct 25 '10 09:10

mickthompson


2 Answers

The standard approach for validating hierarchical structures is to use pushNestedPath()/popNestedPath(), though I'm not sure how it plays with JSR-303:

bindingResult.pushNestedPath("address2");
validate(form.getAddress2(), bindingResult);
bindingResult.popNestedPath();
like image 193
axtavt Avatar answered Sep 18 '22 05:09

axtavt


I've never tried myself, but I think the correct approach is using validator groups.

like image 43
sinuhepop Avatar answered Sep 18 '22 05:09

sinuhepop