I'm currently playing around on Spring boot 1.4.2 in which I've pulled in Spring-boot-starter-web and Spring-boot-starter-jpa.
My main issue is that when I save a new entity it works fine (all cool).
However if I save a new product entity with the same id (eg a duplicate entry), it does not throw an exception. I was expecting ConstrintViolationException or something similar.
Given the following set up:
Application.java
@SpringBootApplication public class Application { public static void main(String[] args) { SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args); }
ProductRepository.java
@Repository public interface ProductRepository extends JpaRepository<Product, String> {}
JpaConfig.java
@Configuration @EnableJpaRepositories(basePackages = "com.verric.jpa.repository" ) @EntityScan(basePackageClasses ="com.verric.jpa") @EnableTransactionManagement public class JpaConfig { @Bean JpaTransactionManager transactionManager() { return new JpaTransactionManager(); } }
Note JpaConfig.java and Application.java are in the same package.
ProductController.java
@RestController @RequestMapping(path = "/product") public class ProductController { @Autowired ProductRepository productRepository; @PostMapping("createProduct") public void handle(@RequestBody @Valid CreateProductRequest request) { Product product = new Product(request.getId(), request.getName(), request.getPrice(), request.isTaxable()); try { productRepository.save(product); } catch (DataAccessException ex) { System.out.println(ex.getCause().getMessage()); } } }
and finally Product.java
@Entity(name = "product") @Getter @Setter @AllArgsConstructor @EqualsAndHashCode(of = "id") public class Product { protected Product() { /* jpa constructor*/ } @Id private String id; @Column private String name; @Column private Long price; @Column private Boolean taxable; }
The getter, setter and equalsHashcode.. are lombok annotations.
Miscellaneous:
Spring boot : 1.4.2
Hibernate ORM: 5.2.2.FINAL
This issue happens regardless if I annotate the controller with or without @Transactional
The underlying db shows the exception clearly
2016-11-15 18:03:49 AEDT [40794-1] verric@stuff ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "product_pkey" 2016-11-15 18:03:49 AEDT [40794-2] verric@stuff DETAIL: Key (id)=(test001) already exists
I know that is better (more common) to break the data access stuff into its own service layer instead of dumping it in the controller
The semantics of the controller aren't ReST
Things I've tried:
Spring CrudRepository exceptions
I've tried implementing the answer from this question, unfortunately my code never ever hits the DataAccesException exception
Does Spring JPA throw an error if save function is unsuccessful?
Again similar response to the question above.
http://www.baeldung.com/spring-dataIntegrityviolationexception
I tried adding the bean to my JPAconfig.java class that is:
@Bean public PersistenceExceptionTranslationPostProcessor exceptionTranslation(){ return new PersistenceExceptionTranslationPostProcessor(); }
But nothing seemed to happen.
Sorry for long post, ty in advance
My solution is a lot cleaner. Spring Data already provides a nice way for us to define how an entity is considered to be new. This can easily be done by implementing Persistable
on our entities, as documented in the reference.
In my case, as is the OP's, the IDs come from an external source and cannot be auto generated. So the default logic used by Spring Data to consider an entity as new if the ID is null wouldn't have worked.
@Entity public class MyEntity implements Persistable<UUID> { @Id private UUID id; @Transient private boolean update; @Override public UUID getId() { return this.id; } public void setId(UUID id) { this.id = id; } public boolean isUpdate() { return this.update; } public void setUpdate(boolean update) { this.update = update; } @Override public boolean isNew() { return !this.update; } @PrePersist @PostLoad void markUpdated() { this.update = true; } }
Here, I have provided a mechanism for the entity to express whether it considers itself new or not by means of another transient boolean property called update
. As the default value of update
will be false
, all entities of this type are considered new and will result in a DataIntegrityViolationException
being thrown when you attempt to call repository.save(entity)
with the same ID.
If you do wish to perform a merge, you can always set the update
property to true
before attempting a save. Of course, if your use case never requires you to update entities, you can always return true
from the isNew
method and get rid of the update
field.
The advantages of this approach over checking whether an entity with the same ID already exists in the database before saving are many:
EDIT: Don't forget to implement a method using JPA callbacks that sets the correct state of the update
boolean field just before persisting and just after loading from the database. If you forget to do this, calling deleteAll
on the JPA repository will have no effect as I painfully found out. This is because the Spring Data implementation of deleteAll
now checks if the entity is new before performing the delete. If your isNew
method returns true, the entity will never be considered for deletion.
I think you are aware of CrudRepository.save()
is used for both insert and update. If an Id is non existing then it will considered an insert if Id is existing it will be considered update. You may get an Exception if your send the Id as null.
Since you don't have any other annotations apart from @Id
on your id
variable, The Unique Id generation must be handled by your code Or else you need to make use of @GeneratedValue
annotation.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With