I'm using spark 1.6 and run into the issue above when I run the following code:
// Imports
import org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveContext
import org.apache.spark.{SparkConf, SparkContext}
import org.apache.spark.sql.SaveMode
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext.Implicits.global
import java.util.Properties
import scala.concurrent.Future
// Set up spark on local with 2 threads
val conf = new SparkConf().setMaster("local[2]").setAppName("app")
val sc = new SparkContext(conf)
val sqlCtx = new HiveContext(sc)
// Create fake dataframe
import sqlCtx.implicits._
var df = sc.parallelize(1 to 50000).map { i => (i, i, i, i, i, i, i) }.toDF("a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g").repartition(2)
// Write it as a parquet file
df.write.parquet("/tmp/parquet1")
df = sqlCtx.read.parquet("/tmp/parquet1")
// JDBC connection
val url = s"jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/tempdb"
val prop = new Properties()
prop.setProperty("user", "admin")
prop.setProperty("password", "")
// 4 futures - at least one of them has been consistently failing for
val x1 = Future { df.write.jdbc(url, "temp1", prop) }
val x2 = Future { df.write.jdbc(url, "temp2", prop) }
val x3 = Future { df.write.jdbc(url, "temp3", prop) }
val x4 = Future { df.write.jdbc(url, "temp4", prop) }
Here's the github gist: https://gist.github.com/karanveerm/27d852bf311e39f05491
The error I get is: at
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.SQLExecution$.withNewExecutionId(SQLExecution.scala:87) ~[org.apache.spark.spark-sql_2.11-1.6.0.jar:1.6.0]
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.withNewExecutionId(DataFrame.scala:2125) ~[org.apache.spark.spark-sql_2.11-1.6.0.jar:1.6.0]
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame.foreachPartition(DataFrame.scala:1482) ~[org.apache.spark.spark-sql_2.11-1.6.0.jar:1.6.0]
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc.JdbcUtils$.saveTable(JdbcUtils.scala:247) ~[org.apache.spark.spark-sql_2.11-1.6.0.jar:1.6.0]
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.jdbc(DataFrameWriter.scala:306) ~[org.apache.spark.spark-sql_2.11-1.6.0.jar:1.6.0]
at writer.SQLWriter$.writeDf(Writer.scala:75) ~[temple.temple-1.0-sans-externalized.jar:na]
at writer.Writer$.writeDf(Writer.scala:33) ~[temple.temple-1.0-sans-externalized.jar:na]
at controllers.Api$$anonfun$downloadTable$1$$anonfun$apply$25.apply(Api.scala:460) ~[temple.temple-1.0-sans-externalized.jar:2.4.6]
at controllers.Api$$anonfun$downloadTable$1$$anonfun$apply$25.apply(Api.scala:452) ~[temple.temple-1.0-sans-externalized.jar:2.4.6]
at scala.util.Success$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Try.scala:237) ~[org.scala-lang.scala-library-2.11.7.jar:na]
Is this a spark bug or am I doing something wrong / any workarounds?
After trying several things, I found that one of the threads created by the global ForkJoinPool
gets its spark.sql.execution.id
property set to a random value.
I could not identify the process that actually did that but I could work around it by using my own ExecutionContext
.
import java.util.concurrent.Executors
import concurrent.ExecutionContext
val executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(4)
implicit val ec = ExecutionContext.fromExecutorService(executorService)
I used code from http://danielwestheide.com/blog/2013/01/16/the-neophytes-guide-to-scala-part-9-promises-and-futures-in-practice.html.
Maybe the ForkJoinPool
clones threads attributes when creating new ones and if this happens during the context of an SQL execution it would get its non null value whereas a FixedThreadPool
will create the threads at instantiation.
Please, check SPARK-13747
Consider to use Spark version 2.2.0 or higher if applicable in your environment.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With