I have a problem with randomizing a list with restrictions in Python (3). I have seen a few other questions relating to this, but none of them really seem to solve my problem. I'm a beginner, so any help is much appreciated!
I'm designing an experiment using two types of stimuli: shapes and colors (four of each). I need to generate permutations of all 16 combinations, which I have done with random.shuffle-function:
import random
# letters are shapes, numbers are colors
x=["a1","a2","a3","a4","b1","b2","b3","b4","c1","c2","c3","c4","d1","d2","d3","d4"]
random.shuffle(x)
So far so good. However, I want to avoid a shape (letter) or color (number) to appear two times in succession in my result (e.g. "a2" followed by "a4", or "c2" followed by "a2").
Is there a way to make such a restriction?
Thanks in advance!
One way to handle this might be to have two lists one of shapes and one of colors. Shuffle each list individually. Now intermix the two lists. Since each list was built randomly, the mixed list is random as well, but you do not have any two entries together.
Note that using zip, you will actually get sets of pairs which will enable you to handle your test by getting each pair from the result.
In this particular case each color is a member of the list shapes while each color is a member of the list colors
shapes = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']
colors = ['1', '2', '3', '4']
zip(shapes, colors)
[('a', '1'), ('b', '2'), ('c', '3'), ('d', '4')]
This gives us each individual shuffle rather than generating all 16 possibilities at once and then shuffling them. This might enable you to generate your test better.
If you want to ensure that two sets of lists do not have the same color or shape in the same position as the previous group of four, then you can test for that after the shuffle against the previous setting.
testing = True
while testing:
newcolors = colors
random.shuffle(newcolors)
# perform the test that you want to make get testresult True or False
if testresult:
colors = newcolors
testing = False
This will keep shuffling until testresult becomes True and discard all invalid results from random.shuffle()
Something like this should give a reasonable answer in a reasonable time
import random
while 1:
choices = ["a1", "a2","a3","b1","b2","b3","c1","c2","c3"]
shuffle = []
last = ""
while choices:
l = choices
if last:
l = [x for x in l if x[0] != last[0] and x[1] != last[1]]
if not l:
#no valid solution
break
newEl = random.choice(l)
last = newEl
shuffle.append(newEl)
choices.remove(newEl)
if not choices:
print(shuffle)
break
I doubt this is the best way, but it is a way of doing this. If you think about your input as a matrix like this
a1, b1, c1, d1
a2, b2, c2, d2
a3, b3, c3, d3
a4, b4, c4, d4
Then you're goal becomes choosing an random index at each iteration such that the new index is not in the same row nor the same column of the matrix as the previous index and such that the new element has not been chosen before. Putting that into code naively, it becomes
import random
shapes_and_colors=["a1","a2","a3","a4","b1","b2","b3","b4","c1","c2","c3","c4","d1","d2","d3","d4"]
nRows = 4
nCols = 4
inds = [(x,y) for x in range(nRows) for y in range(nCols)]
def make_random(someArr):
toRet = []
n = len(someArr)
for i in range(n):
possible = [thing for thing in someArr if thing not in toRet]
prev = poss = None
while poss is None:
next_val = random.choice(possible)
if next_val == prev:
#failed so try again
return make_random(someArr)
if not toRet or (next_val[0] != toRet[-1][0] and next_val[1] != toRet[-1][1]):
poss = next_val
prev = next_val
toRet += poss,
return toRet
ans= [thing for thing in make_random(shapes_and_colors)]
print ans
['c3', 'd4', 'c1', 'd3', 'b1', 'a4', 'b3', 'c4', 'a3', 'b2', 'a1', 'c2', 'd1', 'a2', 'b4', 'd2']
['d4', 'b3', 'c1', 'a4', 'b2', 'c4', 'd3', 'a1', 'c3', 'a2', 'b4', 'd2', 'a3', 'b1', 'c2', 'd1']
Since this is a totally naive approach, it sometimes gets stuck! So suppose the last two indices remaining are [(2, 2), (3, 2)]. Then, there is no possible way for the algorithm to proceed without breaking the restrictions. Right now, I'm handling it with a recursive call, which isn't ideal.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With