Menu
I am using Git for my project and trying to follow best practice:
git merge --squash. This keeps my dev branch clean.This should keep our history, and using gitk, we can see where all of the commits come in. However, I want to be able to see only the commits applied to the master branch. I have tried:
git log master git show-branch None of these show just the history of the master branch. Is there a way to easily do this?
565
I think an option for your purposes is git log --oneline --decorate . This lets you know the checked commit, and the top commits for each branch that you have in your story line. By doing this, you have a nice view on the structure of your repo and the commits associated to a specific branch.
`git log` command is used to view the commit history and display the necessary information of the git repository. This command displays the latest git commits information in chronological order, and the last commit will be displayed first.
Graph all git branchesDevelopers can see all branches in the graph with the –all switch. Also, in most situations, the –decorate switch will provide all the supplemental information in a formatted and nicely color-coded way.
If I'm understanding you correctly, you want to see the merges back into master, but not the history of those merges. I believe that:
git log --merges will give you what you want.
UPDATE: Adding --first-parent should fix this from the sounds of it.
git log --merges --first-parent --first-parent
Follow only the first parent commit upon seeing a merge commit.This option can give a better overview when viewing the evolution of a particular topic branch, because merges into a topic branch tend to be only about adjusting to updated upstream from time to time, and this option allows you to ignore the individual commits brought in to your history by such a merge.
98
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
