File History will not create duplicates instead it will save the newer versions of files that you modify to your files that are being backed up; so that if the originals are lost, damaged, or deleted, you can restore them. You can also browse and restore different versions of your files.
Find duplicate files and remove them with Windows File Explorer. On the lower-left corner beside the Windows icon, enter Indexing Options on the search bar, then click Indexing Options. Click Modify, and then select Show all locations.
You can use git log to display the diffs while searching:
git log -p -- path/to/file
Have you tried this:
gitk path/to/file
git log -p
will generate the a patch (the diff) for every commit selected. For a single file, use git log --follow -p $file
.
If you're looking for a particular change, use git bisect
to find the change in log(n) views by splitting the number of commits in half until you find where what you're looking for changed.
Also consider looking back in history using git blame
to follow changes to the line in question if you know what that is. This command shows the most recent revision to affect a certain line. You may have to go back a few versions to find the first change where something was introduced if somebody has tweaked it over time, but that could give you a good start.
Finally, gitk
as a GUI does show me the patch immediately for any commit I click on.
Example :
The main question for me would be, what are you actually trying to find out? Are you trying to find out, when a certain set of changes was introduced in that file?
You can use git blame
for this, it will anotate each line with a SHA1 and a date when it was changed. git blame
can also tell you when a certain line was deleted or where it was moved if you are interested in that.
If you are trying to find out, when a certain bug was introduced, git bisect
is a very powerfull tool. git bisect
will do a binary search on your history. You can use git bisect start
to start bisecting, then git bisect bad
to mark a commit where the bug is present and git bisect good
to mark a commit which does not have the bug. git will checkout a commit between the two and ask you if it is good or bad. You can usually find the faulty commit within a few steps.
Since I have used git, I hardly ever found the need to manually look through patch histories to find something, since most often git offers me a way to actually look for the information I need.
If you try to think less of how to do a certain workflow, but more in what information you need, you will probably many workflows which (in my opinion) are much more simple and faster.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With