Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Should I always give a return value to my function?

I write JavaScript code and I try to use its functional language nature.

In other functional languages (or even in Ruby), if I don't explicitly set the return value of a function, it will return the value of the last evaluated expression. JavaScript does not follow this pattern. (To be precise, JavaScript always returns a value as well. If nothing was set, then undefined.)

My question is the following: I have a function that doesn't need to (and does not) return a value. Does it make sense in a functional programming context to have a function with no explicit return value? Or did a fail somewhere if I found myself in this case?

For example, I have the following function. It checks periodically if location hash was changed, and if so, calls the given function.

LIB_hashManager = function(f, context) {
    var prev = '';
    var pollHash = function() {
        if (prev !== window.location.hash) {
            prev = window.location.hash;
            f.apply(context);
        }
    };
    window.setInterval(pollHash, 100);
};

Should I return here anything?

Update

Meanwhile it came to my mind, that if anytime in the future I'll need to extend the knowledge of LIB_hashManager, following the functional constructor pattern, I can simply add methods to an object and LIB_hashManager will return that produced object.

LIB_hashManager = function(f, context) {
    // inside logic
    // ...
};

And later I may write:

LIB_hashManager = function(f, context) {
    // inside logic
    // ...

    // return public methods
    return {
        // ...
    }
};

So doesn't make sense then to return an empty object in the first case?

like image 610
viam0Zah Avatar asked May 24 '09 05:05

viam0Zah


2 Answers

A "pure" functional programming environment would have no side effects -- each function's work would be entirely in computing its return value; that's not really feasible in typical uses of Javascript, and so it's perfectly acceptable, when a function has done its work through side effects, to have it return nothing at all, i.e., be a "procedure" rather than a function.

like image 131
Alex Martelli Avatar answered Sep 17 '22 09:09

Alex Martelli


My question is the following: I have a function that doesn't need to (and does not) return a value. Does it make sense in a functional programming context to have a function with no explicit return value? Or did a fail somewhere if I found myself in this case?

According to the academic description of a function: a function must give the same output given an input. A function that does not have any output is absolutely useless, because functions are not supposed to have any side effects.

However, since functional programming languages often need at least 1 side effect, the convention to return nothing is to return a unit or "()". Since this concept does not exist in Javascript, it shouldn't matter to you, since Javascript isn't strongly typed anyway.

like image 30
Unknown Avatar answered Sep 19 '22 09:09

Unknown