Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Should global css styles be set on the html element or the body element?

Tags:

Sometimes I see people apply global css styles to html, sometimes I see them apply them to body, with both raw css and javascript.

Are there any differences between the two? Which is the standard to make a global css style? Is there anything I should know when picking between them?

like image 246
Gordon Gustafson Avatar asked Dec 30 '10 20:12

Gordon Gustafson


People also ask

Where should a style element be in an HTML document?

The <style> element must be included inside the <head> of the document. In general, it is better to put your styles in external stylesheets and apply them using <link> elements.

What is global style in CSS?

What are global styles? When people talk about the global nature of CSS, they can mean one of a few different things. They may be referring to rules on the :root or <body> elements that are inherited globally (with just a few exceptions).

Can you put style tags in the body?

You can place HTML style tags in <head> or <body> elements. We'd recommend choosing the first option, as that allows you to keep the content and styling information separate. Note: you can also use <link> elements to apply styles kept in external stylesheets.


1 Answers

I'm assuming that "global page styling" here refers to things such as fonts, colors and backgrounds.

Personally, I apply global page styling, for the most part, to body and the simple element selectors (p, h1, h2, h3..., input, img, etc). These elements are more closely related to the presentation of content of an HTML page to the user.

My rationale for this is simple: the presentational attributes bgcolor, background, text, topmargin, leftmargin and others were given to the body element, not the html element. These attributes are now converted to their respective CSS rules with extremely low precedence in the cascade:

The UA may choose to honor presentational attributes in an HTML source document. If so, these attributes are translated to the corresponding CSS rules with specificity equal to 0, and are treated as if they were inserted at the start of the author style sheet.

Most if not all implementations I'm aware of will convert these to CSS rules on body, based on their HTML equivalents. Others such as link, alink and vlink will become a:link, a:active and a:visited rules respectively.

Of course, it should be noted that CSS itself doesn't really have any semantics to it per se, as it's a styling language in itself which is completely separate from the content structure of an HTML document. Although the introduction to CSS2.1 covers the basics of styling an HTML document, note that the section calls itself non-normative (or informative); this means it doesn't set any hard and fast rules for CSS implementers to follow. Instead, it simply provides information for readers.

That said, certain styles may be applied to html to modify viewport behavior. For example, to hide the page scrollbars use:

html {     overflow: hidden; } 

You can also apply rules to both html and body for interesting effects; see the following questions for details and examples:

  • What's the difference in applying CSS to html, body, and *?
  • Applying a background to <html> and/or <body>

Note that html is not the viewport; the viewport establishes an initial containing block in which html is situated. That initial containing block cannot be targeted with CSS, because in HTML, the root element is html.

Note also that, technically, there is no difference between applying properties to html and body that are inherited by default, such as font-family and color.

Last but not least, here is an excellent article that details the differences between html and body in terms of CSS. In summary (quoted from its first section):

  • The html and body elements are distinct block-level entities, in a parent/child relationship.
  • The html element's height and width are controlled by the browser window.
  • It is the html element which has (by default) overflow:auto, causing scrollbars to appear when needed.
  • The body element is (by default) position:static, which means that positioned children of it are positioned relative to the html element's coordinate system.
  • In almost all modern browsers, the built-in offset from the edge of the page is applied through a margin on the body element, not padding on the html element.

As the root element, html is more closely associated with the browser viewport than body (which is why it says html has overflow: auto for scrollbars). Note however that the scrollbars are not necessarily generated by the html element itself. By default, it's the viewport that generates these scrollbars; the values of overflow are simply transferred (or propagated) between body, html, and the viewport, depending on which values you set. The details of all this are covered in the CSS2.1 spec, which says:

UAs must apply the 'overflow' property set on the root element to the viewport. When the root element is an HTML "HTML" element or an XHTML "html" element, and that element has an HTML "BODY" element or an XHTML "body" element as a child, user agents must instead apply the 'overflow' property from the first such child element to the viewport, if the value on the root element is 'visible'. The 'visible' value when used for the viewport must be interpreted as 'auto'. The element from which the value is propagated must have a used value for 'overflow' of 'visible'.

The last bullet point probably has its roots in the aforementioned topmargin and leftmargin attributes of the body element.

like image 181
BoltClock Avatar answered Sep 23 '22 17:09

BoltClock