I've had a look at Path.Combine
and noticed it has four overloads:
string
, string
string
, string
, string
string
, string
, string
, string
params string[]
How are the first three overloads useful?
The way I see it, the fourth overload makes the others pretty pointless. I looked at the source and I did see that the fourth overload's implementation is a bit different, but even in this case I would expect to have just the one params
overload which decides which implementation to use based on the array's length.
According to this answer, https://stackoverflow.com/a/2796763/385844, it's to avoid the overhead of creating the parameter array, and because the non-params overloads are convenient for users of languages that do not support variable-length parameter lists.
See also
Why does string.Format come in several flavors?
Just like Oded said, I found out that it must have been there for backward compatibility as I couldn't found it in 2.0, 3.5
I think the overloaded started in 4.0
As for the other many overloads, I wouldn't speak for .net team, but I feel they feel is pointless increasing the overloads every time so they stopped at 4 and provided an Array of string for more than 4 string combinations - which I think is wise
I based my explanation on Lambda expression where the team stopped at 16 arguments
Action(T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11, T12, T13, T14, T15, T16)
Path.Combine could have been like that but is pointless.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With