I'm trying to create a simple looping feature using HTML5 audio and have a very primitive solution as follows:
$(audio).bind('timeupdate', function() { if (audio.currentTime >= 26){ var blah = audio.currentTime; audio.currentTime = 23; console.log(blah); } })
This works fine but the only glitch here is that the timeupdate event doesnt trigger very consistently. For instance, the console.log above returned: 26.14031982421875
26.229642868041992
26.13462257385254
26.21796226501465
...etc. (You get the idea..inconsistent times)
Obviously this won't work for an application where the timing is important (music applications). So the obvious solution to me would be to increase the granularity with which the timeupdate event is triggered. I havent been able to find any API docs...but would love to know if there is a way to do this.
It should be noted that you can read the currentTime property of a video much more often. If time is really critical, and you can live with a little bit of uncertainty, you can try this instead.
It is, however, a lot less elegant than using the tag's own timeupdate
event.
setInterval(function () { console.log(audio.currentTime); // will get you a lot more updates. }, 30);
In this case, you'll have to manage the interval yourself, make sure that you clear it before null
ing the audio element. But it is a possibility.
I'm using this approach on a video element, but it should apply here, too.
I'm sorry, but that's the way it works. From the html5 specs:
Every 15 to 250ms, or whenever the MediaController's media controller position changes, whichever happens least often, the user agent must queue a task to fire a simple event named timeupdate at the MediaController.
Also,
The event thus is not to be fired faster than about 66Hz or slower than 4Hz (assuming the event handlers don't take longer than 250ms to run). User agents are encouraged to vary the frequency of the event based on the system load and the average cost of processing the event each time, so that the UI updates are not any more frequent than the user agent can comfortably handle while decoding the video.
If you read through the specification, you can get the idea that timeupdate
event is something of a "best effort" kind of event. It will fire when it can and always as long as it does not to affect performance too much.
You could filter the events discarding some from time to time to smooth the arrival times, but I'm afraid it's not possible to do the opposite.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With