I want to use setitimer()
(or less probable, the alarm()
) in multithreaded process in linux 2.6+ with NPTL-enabled libc. Which thread will receive sigalarm (SIGALRM)
from kernel?
Thanks.
2014-04 update: How should I set the setitimer()
in multithreaded program, if I want to write a profiling utility like gperftools's cpuprofile; but in my tool I want to support both dynamically linked programs (so it is possible to inject my own library to init profiling) and statically linked programs (without the possibility of doing ^^^^^^).
My current profiling tool works with setting setitimer
just after fork()
and before exec()
, and it also uses ptrace
to get control over the target program and to hijack SIGPROF/SIGVPROF/SIGALRM generated by the setitimer
. I have no exact idea how it works with multithreaded programs.
The setitimer() function sets the timer specified by which to the value in the structure pointed to by value and stores the previous value of the timer in the structure pointed to by ovalue.
SIGALRM is an asynchronous signal. The SIGALRM signal is raised when a time interval specified in a call to the alarm or alarmd function expires. Because SIGALRM is an asynchronous signal, the SAS/C library discovers the signal only when you call a function, when a function returns, or when you issue a call to sigchk .
From signal(7) man page:
A process-directed signal may be delivered to any one of the threads that does not currently have the signal blocked. If more than one of the threads has the signal unblocked, then the kernel chooses an arbitrary thread to which to deliver the signal.
Now, alarm(2) man page says that:
alarm() arranges for a SIGALRM signal to be delivered to the process in seconds seconds.
So, the signal is delivered to a process (a signal might be directed at certain thread too) and thus you do not know which of the threads will receive it.
The same with setitimer(2):
When any timer expires, a signal is sent to the process, and the timer (potentially) restarts.
You could block SIGALARM
in all your threads except one, then you could be certain that it will be delivered to that only thread. Assuming you are using pthreads, you can block signals with pthread_sigmask().
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With