I need to implement communication between two devices through serial ports on Raspberry Pi (with last Raspbian on board). Both uses CP2102 controller and connected to the Pi.
Terminal:
pi@pi ~ $ ls -l /dev/serial/by-id
total 0
Silicon_Labs_CP2102_USB_to_UART_Bridge_Controller_0001-if00-port0 -> ../../ttyUSB2
pi@pi ~ $ ls -l /dev/serial/by-path
total 0
platform-bcm2708_usb-usb-0:1.2.1:1.0-port0 -> ../../ttyUSB1
platform-bcm2708_usb-usb-0:1.2.4:1.0-port0 -> ../../ttyUSB2
platform-bcm2708_usb-usb-0:1.3:1.0-port0 -> ../../ttyUSB0
Normally when I send command to SERIAL A, Device A replies through SERIAL A and sends data through SERIAL B. After that I need to retranslate this data to Device B (SERIAL C) and receive answer from SERIAL C.
The problem is that SERIAL A reply appears on SERIAL B and SERIAL B data appears on SERIAL A.
I've tried different languages and serial libraries but the result is the same. So the questions are: why is it happening when using Raspberry Pi? How can I implement this functionality on Raspberry Pi?
P.S. Both devices are working properly. My C# code works perfect. I used System.IO.Ports.SerialPort class for that implementation and it looks like Pi4J and RXTX solutions.
P.P.S. Some code that I tried to use on RPi:
Serial, C++: (very bad piece of code)
Serial port("/dev/ttyUSB2", 115200U);
Serial port1("/dev/ttyUSB1", 115200U);
port1.setTimeout(Timeout::max(), 250, 0, 250, 0);
port.setTimeout(Timeout::max(), 250, 0, 250, 0);
cout << "Is the serial port open?";
if (port1.isOpen()) {
cout << " Yes." << endl;
uint8_t data[2] = { 0xAA, 0x00 };
port1.write(data, 2);
data[1] = 0xFF;
sleep(1);
port1.write(data, 2);
while (port.available() < 7);
int av = port.available();
string ss;
port.read(ss, av);
for (int i = 0; i < av; i++){
cout << (uint)ss.at(i) << " ";
}
cout << "av: " + (uint)av << endl;
}
RXTX, Java:
public class Bridge_rxtx {
public static final int baudrate = 115200;
protected SerialPort spDevB_Data;
SerialReader devB_DataListener;
protected SerialPort spDevA_Data;
SerialReader DevA_DataListener;
protected SerialPort spDevA_Control;
SerialPortEventListener DevA_ControlListener;
public Bridge_rxtx(String comDevB_Data, String comDevA_Data, String comDevA_Control) {
try {
spDevB_Data = setupPort(comDevB_Data);
spDevA_Data = setupPort(comDevA_Data);
spDevA_Control = setupPort(comDevA_Control);
} catch (Exception ignored){
ignored.printStackTrace();
}
try {
devB_DataListener = new SerialReader(spDevB_Data.getInputStream(), spDevA_Data.getOutputStream(), "B-A");
DevA_DataListener = new SerialReader(spDevA_Data.getInputStream(), spDevB_Data.getOutputStream(), "A-B");
DevA_ControlListener = new SerialPortEventListener() {
@Override
public void serialEvent(SerialPortEvent spe) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Not supported yet.");
}
};
spDevB_Data.notifyOnDataAvailable(true);
spDevA_Data.notifyOnDataAvailable(true);
spDevA_Control.notifyOnDataAvailable(true);
} catch (IOException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(Bridge_rxtx.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
}
public void launchBridge(){
System.out.println("Starting...");
try {
spDevA_Control.getOutputStream().write(new byte[] {(byte)0xAA, (byte) 0x00}, 0, 2);
} catch (IOException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(Bridge_rxtx.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
try {
Thread.sleep(200);
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(Bridge_rxtx.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
try {
spDevA_Control.getOutputStream().write(new byte[] {(byte)0xAA, (byte) 0xFF}, 0, 2);
} catch (IOException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(Bridge_rxtx.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
System.out.println("Started");
}
SerialPort setupPort(String portName) throws Exception {
SerialPort serialPort = null;
CommPortIdentifier portIdentifier = CommPortIdentifier.getPortIdentifier(portName);
if (portIdentifier.isCurrentlyOwned()) {
System.out.println("Error: Port is currently in use");
} else {
CommPort commPort = portIdentifier.open(this.getClass().getName(), 2000);
if (commPort instanceof SerialPort) {
serialPort = (SerialPort) commPort;
serialPort.setSerialPortParams(baudrate, SerialPort.DATABITS_8, SerialPort.STOPBITS_1, SerialPort.PARITY_NONE);
} else {
System.out.println("Error: Only serial ports are handled by this code.");
}
}
return serialPort;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Bridge_rxtx bridge = new Bridge_rxtx("/dev/ttyUSB0", "/dev/ttyUSB2", "/dev/ttyUSB1");
bridge.launchBridge();
}
}
Pi4J, Java:
public class Bridge {
public static Bridge instance;
public static final int baudrate = 115200;
protected Serial spDevB_Data;
SerialDataListener devB_DataListener;
protected Serial spDevA_Data;
SerialDataListener devA_DataListener;
protected Serial spDevA_Control;
SerialDataListener devA_ControlListener;
private Bridge() {
}
public Bridge(String comDevB_Data, String comDevA_Data, String comDevA_Control) {
instance = this;
devA_ControlListener = new SerialDataListener() {
//SerialDataEvent in Pi4J doesn't support binary
//data by default. I implemented this myself.
public void dataReceived(SerialDataEvent event) {
System.out.println(bytesToHex(toPrimitives(event.getBinaryData())));
}
};
devB_DataListener = new SerialDataListener() {
public void dataReceived(SerialDataEvent event) {
byte[] data = toPrimitives(event.getBinaryData());
instance.spDevA_Data.write(data);
System.out.println("B -> A: " + bytesToHex(data));
}
};
devA_DataListener = new SerialDataListener() {
public void dataReceived(SerialDataEvent event) {
byte[] data = toPrimitives(event.getBinaryData());
instance.spDevB_Data.write(data);
try {
Thread.sleep(15);
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(Bridge.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
System.out.println("B <- A: " + bytesToHex(data));
}
};
spDevB_Data = SerialFactory.createInstance();
spDevB_Data.addListener(devB_DataListener);
spDevA_Data = SerialFactory.createInstance();
spDevA_Data.addListener(devA_ControlListener);
spDevA_Control = SerialFactory.createInstance();
spDevA_Control.addListener(devA_DataListener);
spDevB_Data.setMonitorInterval(40);
spDevA_Data.setMonitorInterval(80);
spDevA_Control.setMonitorInterval(25);
spDevB_Data.open(comDevB_Data, baudrate);
spDevA_Data.open(comDevA_Data, baudrate);
spDevA_Control.open(comDevA_Control, baudrate);
}
public void SetupBridge() {
spDevA_Control.write(new byte[]{(byte) 0xAA, (byte) 0x00});
try {
Thread.sleep(20);
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(Bridge.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
spDevA_Control.write(new byte[]{(byte) 0xAA, (byte) 0xFF});
}
}
Linux names its serial ports in the UNIX tradition. The first serial port has the file name /dev/ttyS0, the second serial port has the file name /dev/ttyS1, and so on. This differs from the IBM PC tradition. The first serial port is named COM1:, the second serial port is named COM2:, and so on.
You can indeed simultaneously read and write through the serial port. At the hardware level, the serial port (the UART) is a transmitter and a receiver, which are almost independent. At the software level, they are both handled through interrupts that read from / write to a software buffer.
To send data to a serial device, pass data to port. writable. getWriter(). write() .
Not enough reputation to comment: My educated guess would be that it has something to do with how Linux enumerates hardware. I think it's possible that your USB devices will have another serial-path depending on the used distro, and order of connecting them.
Are you sure that you use the same USB port every time? And that the correct USB port is mapped to /dev/tty?
You can force a HID to always have the same name by making sure you have a udev rule for it. Some info here
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With