I have tried the below query:
select empno from ( select empno from emp order by sal desc ) where rownum = 2
This is not returning any records.
When I tried this query
select rownum,empno from ( select empno from emp order by sal desc)
It gives me this output:
ROWNUM EMPNO 1 7802 2 7809 3 7813 4 7823
Can anyone tell me what's the problem with my first query? Why is it not returning any records when I add the ROWNUM filter?
You can use ROWNUM to limit the number of rows returned by a query, as in this example: SELECT * FROM employees WHERE ROWNUM < 10; If an ORDER BY clause follows ROWNUM in the same query, then the rows will be reordered by the ORDER BY clause. The results can vary depending on the way the rows are accessed.
For example, to find the second row in the scot. emp table when sorted by ename (and then, in case of a tie, empno), you can do this: WITH got_rnum AS( SELECT empno, ename, deptno -- or whatever you want , ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( ORDER BY ename , empno ) AS rnum FROM scott.
Oracle's ROWNUM starts on 1 and is only incremented when assigned to a row that passes the WHERE condition. Since you're filtering on ROWNUM=2, ROWNUM=1 doesn't pass the WHERE condition, and ROWNUM is therefore never assigned to a row and incremented to 2.
To explain this behaviour, we need to understand how Oracle processes ROWNUM. When assigning ROWNUM to a row, Oracle starts at 1 and only increments the value when a row is selected; that is, when all conditions in the WHERE clause are met. Since our condition requires that ROWNUM is greater than 2, no rows are selected and ROWNUM is never incremented beyond 1.
The bottom line is that conditions such as the following will work as expected.
.. WHERE rownum = 1;
.. WHERE rownum <= 10;
While queries with these conditions will always return zero rows.
.. WHERE rownum = 2;
.. WHERE rownum > 10;
Quoted from Understanding Oracle rownum
You should modify you query in this way in order to work:
select empno from ( select empno, rownum as rn from ( select empno from emp order by sal desc ) ) where rn=2;
EDIT: I've corrected the query to get the rownum after the order by sal desc
In the first query, the first row will have ROWNUM = 1 so will be rejected. The second row will also have ROWNUM = 1 (because the row before was rejected) and also be rejected, the third row will also have ROWNUM = 1 (because all rows before it were rejected) and also be rejected etc... The net result is that all rows are rejected.
The second query should not return the result you got. It should correctly assign ROWNUM after ORDER BY.
As a consequence of all this, you need to use not 2 but 3 levels of subqueries, like this:
SELECT EMPNO, SAL FROM ( -- Make sure row is not rejected before next ROWNUM can be assigned. SELECT EMPNO, SAL, ROWNUM R FROM ( -- Make sure ROWNUM is assigned after ORDER BY. SELECT EMPNO, SAL FROM EMP ORDER BY SAL DESC ) ) WHERE R = 2
The result:
EMPNO SAL ---------------------- ---------------------- 3 7813
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With