I am guessing that, for compatibility reasons, the type of vararg parameters Any*
is Array[Any] - please correct this if I'm wrong. However, this does not explain the following error:
class Api(api_url: String, params: Seq[(String, String)]) { def this(api_url: String, params: (String, String)*) = this(api_url, params.seq) }
This code does not compile, but gives the warning:
double definition: constructor Api:(api_url: String, params: (String, String)*)Api and constructor Api:(api_url: String, params: Seq[(String, String)])Api at line 13 have same type after erasure: (api_url: java.lang.String, params: Seq)Api
So how do I define a constructor taking either varargs or a sequence?
A method taking varargs is also always taking a sequence, so there is no need to define an auxiliary constructor or overloaded method.
Given
class Api(api_url: String, params: (String, String)*)
you can call it like this
new Api("url", ("a", "b"), ("c", "d"))
or
val seq = Seq(("a", "b"), ("c", "d")) new Api("url", seq:_*)
Also, in your question, you are calling method seq on the params parameter. This probably does not do what you intended. seq is used to ensure that operations on the resulting collection are executed sequentially instead of in parallel. The method was introduced with the parallel collections in version 2.9.0 of Scala.
What you probably wanted to use was toSeq, which returns the collection it is used on converted to a Seq (or itself if it is already a Seq). But as varargs parameters are already typed as Seq, that is a no-op anyway.
No: actually, Any*
is actually almost identical to Seq[Any]
, not to Array[Any]
.
To disambiguate between the two, you can use the technique to add a dummy implicit parameter to make the signature different:
class Api(api_url: String, params: Seq[(String, String)]) { def this(api_url: String, params: (String, String)*)(implicit d: DummyImplicit) = this(api_url, params) }
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With