I'm working on a Rails plugin that includes a way to modify the order of associated records in a has_many :through association. Say we have the following models:
class Playlist < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :playlists_songs, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :songs, :through => :playlists_songs
end
class Song < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :playlists_songs, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :playlists, :through => :playlists_songs
end
class PlaylistsSong < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :playlist
belongs_to :song
end
If we change the order of a Playlist's Songs (e.g. @playlist.songs.rotate!
), Rails doesn't touch the records in the playlists_songs table (I'm using Rails 3.1), which makes sense. I'd like to make any call to Playlist's songs= method save the order of the Songs, though, perhaps by either deleting the relevant existing rows in playlists_songs and creating new ones in the proper order (so that :order => "id"
could be used when retrieving them) or by adding a sort:integer column to playlists_songs and updating those values accordingly.
I didn't see any callbacks (e.g. before_add) that would allow this. In ActiveRecord::Associations::CollectionAssociation, the relevant methods seem to be writer, replace, and replace_records, but I'm lost on what the best next step would be. Is there a way to extend or safely override one of these methods to allow for the functionality I'm seeking (preferably for only specific associations), or is there a different, better approach for this?
In Rails, an association can be defined as a relationship between two Active Record models. For example, in the Granite application, a task created by a user. And each user can create multiple tasks thus building a relationship between the User and Task models.
In Ruby on Rails, a polymorphic association is an Active Record association that can connect a model to multiple other models. For example, we can use a single association to connect the Review model with the Event and Restaurant models, allowing us to connect a review with either an event or a restaurant.
They essentially do the same thing, the only difference is what side of the relationship you are on. If a User has a Profile , then in the User class you'd have has_one :profile and in the Profile class you'd have belongs_to :user . To determine who "has" the other object, look at where the foreign key is.
Have you looked at acts_as_list? It's one of the most old-school of rails plugins, and is intended to handle this sort of problem.
Rather than sorting on id
, it sorts on a positional column. Then it's simply a matter of updating the position, rather than the messy business of changing the id
or deleting/replacing records.
In your case, you'd simply add a position
integer column to PlayListSong
, then:
class PlayListSong
acts_as_list :scope => :play_list_id
end
As you point out in the comments, the methods in acts_as_list
work mostly on individual items in the list, and there's no "reorder" functionality out of the box. I would not recommend tampering with replace_records
to do this. It would be cleaner and more explicit to write a method making use of the same position column as the plugin. For example.
class PlayList
# It makes sense for these methods to be on the association. You might make it
# work for #songs instead (as in your question), but the join table is what's
# keeping the position.
has_many :play_list_songs, ... do
# I'm not sure what rotate! should do, so...
# This first method makes use of acts_as_list's functionality
#
# This should take the last song and move it to the first, incrementing
# the position of all other songs, effectively rotating the list forward
# by 1 song.
def rotate!
last.move_to_top unless empty?
end
# this, on the other hand, would reorder given an array of play_list_songs.
#
# Note: this is a rough (untested) idea and could/should be reworked for
# efficiency and safety.
def reorder!(reordered_songs)
position = 0
reordered_songs.each do |song|
position += 1
# Note: update_column is 3.1+, but I'm assuming you're using it, since
# that was the source you linked to in your question
find(song.id).update_column(:position, position)
end
end
end
end
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With