I'm trying to eliminate all the warnings of my Android application and one of them is this:
viewModel.value is a boxed field but needs to be un-boxed to execute android:checked. This may cause NPE so Data Binding will safely unbox it. You can change the expression and explicitly wrap viewModel.value with safeUnbox() to prevent the warning
Where value is a generic ObservableField
that comes from a super class:
public abstract class BaseDataTypeViewModel<T> extends BaseObservable {
public final ObservableField<T> value = new ObservableField<>();
...
}
And is extented somewhere as a Boolean
:
public class CheckBooleanDataTypeViewModel extends BaseDataTypeViewModel<Boolean> {
...
}
I saw on data binding - safeUnbox warning that the warnings happen because this is a Boolean
and not a boolean
, so I tried to add this: android:checked="@={safeUnbox(viewModel.value)}"
instead of android:checked="@={viewModel.value}"
but then I got an error saying I can't invert the safeUnbox()
method.
****/ data binding error ****msg:The expression android.databinding.DynamicUtil.safeUnbox(viewModelValue) cannot be inverted: There is no inverse for method safeUnbox, you must add an @InverseMethod annotation to the method to indicate which method should be used when using it in two-way binding expressions
I understand correctly the 2 separated issues, but do I have to live with the warning to avoid the error or is their a solution to avoid both the warning and the error? What about the @InverseMethod
it is talking about? I didn't manage to add this annotation because the method comes from the android package.
I haven't worked with Android Architecture Components or with the Data Binding libraries in this particular way, but I think I can still help.
Within your XML, you've got this:
android:checked="@={viewModel.value}"
The system is giving you a warning because it wants you to know that in the case where viewModel.value
is null
, it's going to do something special (behave as though it were false
instead, presumably). It does this via the safeUnbox()
method.
To solve the warning, it's suggesting making the safeUnbox()
call explicit. You can't do that because there's no "inverse" of safeUnbox()
to go back from boolean
to Boolean
.
But it doesn't sound like you have to use safeUnbox()
; you could create your own method that converts Boolean
to boolean
, and then you could use the suggested annotation to declare which method will convert back from boolean
to Boolean
.
public class MyConversions {
@InverseMethod("myBox")
public static boolean myUnbox(Boolean b) {
return (b != null) && b.booleanValue();
}
public static Boolean myBox(boolean b) {
return b ? Boolean.TRUE : Boolean.FALSE;
}
}
Now you can change your XML to:
android:checked="@={com.example.stackoverflow.MyConversions.myUnbox(viewModel.value)}"
I hope this helps. If it turns out that I'm way off-base, let me know; I'd love to learn more about this topic.
Most of what I have in this answer I learned from https://medium.com/google-developers/android-data-binding-inverse-functions-95aab4b11873
Came across this issue and found an easier solution. You can avoid this warning by creating a custom BindingAdapter for the boxed type like this:
@BindingAdapter("android:checked")
public static void setChecked(CompoundButton checkableView, Boolean isChecked) {
checkableView.setChecked(isChecked != null ? isChecked : false);
}
This solution can be replicated to any property like visibility
, enabled
etc. and to any boxed primitive like Integer
, Float
etc.
You can also provide the value to be used in case your LiveData
value is null
like this:
@BindingAdapter(value={"android:checked", "nullValue"}, requireAll=false)
public static void setChecked(CompoundButton checkableView, Boolean isChecked, boolean nullValue) {
checkableView.setChecked(isChecked != null ? isChecked : nullValue);
}
And call it like this:
<CheckBox
...
android:checked='@{viewModel.value}'
app:nullValue="@{false}"
/>
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With