I have a bunch of tests that are organized in JUnit test suites. These tests are greatly utilizing selenium to test a web application. So, naturaly for selenium, the runtime of these tests is quite long. Since the test classes in the suites can not run parallel due some overlaps in the test database, i would like to run the suites parallel.
The JUnit ParallelComputer can only execute tests on class or method level in parallel, are there any standard ways for JUnit to do that with suites?
If i just pass suite classes to the junit runner and configure the computer to parallelize on class level, it picks the test classes itself, not the suites.
br Frank
Once the parallel execution property is set (or enabled), the JUnit Jupiter engine will run the tests in parallel as per the configurations provided with the synchronization mechanisms.
A plugin that allows you to run JUnit4 tests in parallel (using multiple CPU cores/threads).
We can use the @Suite, @SelectPackages, and @SelectClasses annotations to group test cases and run them as a suite in JUnit 5. A suite is a collection of test cases that we can group together and run as a single test.
Parallel Testing is a process to leverage automation testing capabilities by allowing the execution of the same tests simultaneously in multiple environments, real device combinations, and browser configurations. The overarching goal of parallel testing is to reduce time and resource constraints.
Since Suite is used to annotate a Class, so run the Suite-annotated class in JUnitCore.runClasses(ParallelComputer.classes(), cls)
way. cls
are Suite-annotated classes.
@RunWith(Suite.class)
@Suite.SuiteClasses({
Test1.class,
Test2.class})
public class Suite1 {
}
@RunWith(Suite.class)
@Suite.SuiteClasses({
Test3.class,
Test4.class})
public class Suite2 {
}
...
JUnitCore.runClasses(ParallelComputer.classes(), new Class[]{Suite1.class, Suite2.class})
Here is some code that worked for me. I did not write this. If you use @RunWith(ConcurrentSuite.class)
instead of @RunWith(Suite.class)
it should work. There is an annotation that is also needed which is found below.
package utilities.runners;
import org.junit.internal.builders.AllDefaultPossibilitiesBuilder;
import org.junit.runner.Runner;
import org.junit.runners.Suite;
import org.junit.runners.model.InitializationError;
import org.junit.runners.model.RunnerBuilder;
import org.junit.runners.model.RunnerScheduler;
import utilities.annotations.Concurrent;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Queue;
import java.util.concurrent.CompletionService;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorCompletionService;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadFactory;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
/**
* @author Mathieu Carbou ([email protected])
*/
public final class ConcurrentSuite extends Suite {
public ConcurrentSuite(final Class<?> klass) throws InitializationError {
super(klass, new AllDefaultPossibilitiesBuilder(true) {
@Override
public Runner runnerForClass(Class<?> testClass) throws Throwable {
List<RunnerBuilder> builders = Arrays.asList(
new RunnerBuilder() {
@Override
public Runner runnerForClass(Class<?> testClass) throws Throwable {
Concurrent annotation = testClass.getAnnotation(Concurrent.class);
if (annotation != null)
return new ConcurrentJunitRunner(testClass);
return null;
}
},
ignoredBuilder(),
annotatedBuilder(),
suiteMethodBuilder(),
junit3Builder(),
junit4Builder());
for (RunnerBuilder each : builders) {
Runner runner = each.safeRunnerForClass(testClass);
if (runner != null)
return runner;
}
return null;
}
});
setScheduler(new RunnerScheduler() {
ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(
klass.isAnnotationPresent(Concurrent.class) ?
klass.getAnnotation(Concurrent.class).threads() :
(int) (Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() * 1.5),
new NamedThreadFactory(klass.getSimpleName()));
CompletionService<Void> completionService = new ExecutorCompletionService<Void>(executorService);
Queue<Future<Void>> tasks = new LinkedList<Future<Void>>();
@Override
public void schedule(Runnable childStatement) {
tasks.offer(completionService.submit(childStatement, null));
}
@Override
public void finished() {
try {
while (!tasks.isEmpty())
tasks.remove(completionService.take());
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
} finally {
while (!tasks.isEmpty())
tasks.poll().cancel(true);
executorService.shutdownNow();
}
}
});
}
static final class NamedThreadFactory implements ThreadFactory {
static final AtomicInteger poolNumber = new AtomicInteger(1);
final AtomicInteger threadNumber = new AtomicInteger(1);
final ThreadGroup group;
NamedThreadFactory(String poolName) {
group = new ThreadGroup(poolName + "-" + poolNumber.getAndIncrement());
}
@Override
public Thread newThread(Runnable r) {
return new Thread(group, r, group.getName() + "-thread-" + threadNumber.getAndIncrement(), 0);
}
}
}
And the annotation is as follows.
package utilities.annotations;
import java.lang.annotation.ElementType;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;
/**
* @author Mathieu Carbou ([email protected])
*/
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target({ ElementType.TYPE })
public @interface Concurrent {
int threads() default 5;
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With