I'm trying to convert my grammar from v3 to v4 and having some trouble.
In v3 I have rules like this:
dataspec[DataLayout layout] returns [DataExtractor extractor]
@init {
DataExtractorBuilder builder = new DataExtractorBuilder(layout);
}
@after {
extractor = builder.create();
}
: first=expr { builder.addAll(first); } (COMMA next=expr { builder.addAll(next); })*
;
expr returns [List<ValueExtractor> ext]
...
However, with rules in v4 returning these custom context objects instead of what I explicitly told them to return, things are all messed up. What's the v4 way to do this?
There are multiple cases here:
layout
)extractor
)first
, next
)When accessing passed-in variables or the return value of the current rule you simply need to prefix the name given in the rule definition with $
.
layout
becomes $layout
extractor
becomes $extractor
Evidently what needs to be done is to reference the variables' member which is named according to the returns
clause of the rule which returned the value.
For example, first
is capturing the result from the expr
rule, and expr
names its return value ext
, meaning that:
first
becomes $first.ext
next
becomes $next.ext
$
formUnlike in v3 where you could reference certain variables as regular java fields, using the $
form is necessary in all cases, including in actions, in the @init
and @after
blocks, and when passing variables to other rules.
If you're capturing optional tokens in a local variable, you may run into null pointer exceptions now that you're referencing an attribute of that variable.
single_lname returns [String s]
: p=LNAME_PREFIX? r=NAME { $p.text + toNameCase($r.text); }
;
You'll need to check whether $p
is null, but most of the time this would result in a "missing attribute access" error. ANTLR4 makes a special exception so that you can check this, which only applies when used in an if
condition (refactoring this to use the ternary operator, for example, will still result in the error).
single_lname returns [String s]
: p=LNAME_PREFIX? r=NAME {
if ($p == null) {
$s = toNameCase($r.text);
} else {
$s = $p.text + toNameCase($r.text);
}
}
;
Putting it all together, the dataspec
rule becomes:
dataspec[DataLayout layout] returns [DataExtractor extractor]
@init {
DataExtractorBuilder builder = new DataExtractorBuilder($layout);
}
@after {
$extractor = builder.create();
}
: first=expr { builder.addAll($first.ext); }
(COMMA next=expr { builder.addAll($next.ext); })*
;
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With