Possible Duplicate:
What does map(&:name) mean in Ruby?
In Ruby, I know that if I do:
some_objects.each(&:foo)
It's the same as
some_objects.each { |obj| obj.foo }
That is, &:foo
creates the block { |obj| obj.foo }
, turns it into a Proc, and passes it to each. Why does this work? Is it just a Ruby special case, or is there reason why this works as it does?
Your question is wrong, so to speak. What's happening here isn't "ampersand and colon", it's "ampersand and object". The colon in this case is for the symbol. So, there's &
and there's :foo
.
The &
calls to_proc
on the object, and passes it as a block to the method. In Ruby, to_proc
is implemented on Symbol
, so that these two calls are equivalent:
something {|i| i.foo }
something(&:foo)
So, to sum up: &
calls to_proc
on the object and passes it as a block to the method, and Ruby implements to_proc
on Symbol
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With