(Sorry for the newbie question.) In Ruby, what is the difference between the loops:
@cars.each do |car|
and
for car in @cars do
?
is there a difference in efficiency, or why do we need two (or more) ways to express the same thing? The second way seems more elegant/natural to me, but I may be missing some crucial observation, why the first may be the better choice.
More people use the @cars.each
notation because that generalizes to other methods (like #inject
, #each_with_index
, #map
, etc, as well as non-iterator callbacks).
for/in is mainly just syntactic sugar for #each
. The main difference in how the two work is in variable scoping:
irb> @cars = %w{ ford chevy honda toyota }
#=> ["ford", "chevy", "honda", "toyota"]
irb> @cars.each { |car| puts car }
ford
chevy
honda
toyota
#=> ["ford", "chevy", "honda", "toyota"]
irb> car
NameError: undefined local variable or method `car` for #<Object:0x399770 @cars=["ford", "chevy", "honda", "toyota"]>
from (irb):3
from /usr/local/bin/irb:12:in `<main>`
irb> for car in @cars
puts car.reverse
end
drof
yvehc
adnoh
atoyot
#=> ["ford", "chevy", "honda", "toyota"]
irb> car
#=> "toyota"
for/in leaves the iterator variable in scope afterwards, while #each
doesn't.
Personally, I never use ruby's for/in syntax.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With