I have this piece of layout html:
<body ng-controller="MainController">
<div id="terminal"></div>
<div ng-view></div>
<!-- including scripts -->
</body>
Now apparently, when I try to use $routeParams
in MainController
, it's always empty. It's important to note that MainController
is supposed to be in effect in every possible route; therefore I'm not defining it in my app.js. I mean, I'm not defining it here:
$routeProvider.when("/view1", {
templateUrl: "partials/partial1.html"
controller: "MyCtrl1"
})
$routeProvider.when("/view2", {
templateUrl: "partials/partial2.html"
controller: "MyCtrl2"
})
// I'm not defining MainController here!!
In fact, I think my problem is perfectly the same as this one: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/angular/ib2wHQozeNE
However, I still don't get how to get route parameters in my main controller...
EDIT:
What I meant was that I'm not associating my MainController with any specific route. It's defined; and it's the parent controller of all other controllers. What I'm trying to know is that when you go to a URL like /whatever
, which is matched by a route like /:whatever
, why is it that only the sub-controller is able to access the route parameter, whereas the main controller is not? How do I get the :whatever
route parameter in my main controller?
The $routeParams
service is populated asynchronously. This means it will typically appear empty when first used in a controller.
To be notified when $routeParams
has been populated, subscribe to the $routeChangeSuccess
event on the $scope
. (If you're in a component that doesn't have access to a child $scope
, e.g., a service or a factory, you can inject and use $rootScope
instead.)
module.controller('FooCtrl', function($scope, $routeParams) {
$scope.$on('$routeChangeSuccess', function() {
// $routeParams should be populated here
});
);
Controllers used by a route, or within a template included by a route, will have immediate access to the fully-populated $routeParams
because ng-view
waits for the $routeChangeSuccess
event before continuing. (It has to wait, since it needs the route information in order to decide which template/controller to even load.)
If you know your controller will be used inside of ng-view
, you won't need to wait for the routing event. If you know your controller will not, you will. If you're not sure, you'll have to explicitly allow for both possibilities. Subscribing to $routeChangeSuccess
will not be enough; you will only see the event if $routeParams
wasn't already populated:
module.controller('FooCtrl', function($scope, $routeParams) {
// $routeParams will already be populated
// here if this controller is used within ng-view
$scope.$on('$routeChangeSuccess', function() {
// $routeParams will be populated here if
// this controller is used outside ng-view
});
);
As an alternate to the $timeout that plong0 mentioned...
You can also inject the $route service which will show your params immediately.
angular.module('MyModule')
.controller('MainCtrl', function ($scope, $route) {
console.log('routeParams:'+JSON.stringify($route.current.params));
});
I have the same problem.
What I discovered is that, $routeParams take some time to load in the Main Controller, it probably initiate the Main Controller first and then set $routeParams at the Child Controller. I did a workaround for it creating a method in the Main Controller $scope and pass $routeParams through it in the Child Controllers:
angular.module('MyModule')
.controller('MainController', ["$scope", function ($scope) {
$scope.parentMethod = function($routeParams) {
//do stuff
}
}]);
angular.module('MyModule')
.controller('MyCtrl1', ["$scope", function ($scope) {
$scope.parentMethod($routeParams);
}]);
angular.module('MyModule')
.controller('MyCtrl2', ["$scope", function ($scope) {
$scope.parentMethod($routeParams);
}]);
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With