I am using jdk 1.8.0_45, and our tests discovered a bug in rouding. RoundingMode.HALF_DOWN works the same as RoundingMode.HALF_UP when the last decimal that decide the rounding is 5.
I found related issues with RoundingMode.HALF_UP, but they are fixed in update 40. I also put a bug to the oracle, but from my experience they are really unresponsive.
package testjava8;
import java.math.RoundingMode;
import java.text.DecimalFormat;
public class Formatori {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        DecimalFormat format = new DecimalFormat("#,##0.0000");
        format.setRoundingMode(RoundingMode.HALF_DOWN);
        Double toFormat = 10.55555;
        System.out.println("Round down");
        System.out.println(format.format(toFormat));
        format.setRoundingMode(RoundingMode.HALF_UP);
        toFormat = 10.55555;
        System.out.println("Round up");
        System.out.println(format.format(toFormat));
    }
}
Actual result: Round down 10.5556 Round up 10.5556
Expected result(obtain with jdk 1.7): Round down 10.5555 Round up 10.5556
DOWN − Rounding mode to round towards zero. FLOOR − Rounding mode to round towards negative infinity. HALF_DOWN − Rounding mode to round towards "nearest neighbor" unless both neighbors are equidistant, in which case round down.
public enum RoundingMode extends Enum<RoundingMode> Specifies a rounding behavior for numerical operations capable of discarding precision. Each rounding mode indicates how the least significant returned digit of a rounded result is to be calculated.
The default rounding mode of DecimalFormat is RoundingMode. HALF_EVEN . This means that it rounds up, or rounds down if the number is nearer to the next neighbour. When the number is exactly between two neighbours (in your case, 2 and 3), it rounds to the nearest even number (in your case, 2).
When you round toward ceiling, both positive and negative numbers are rounded toward positive infinity. As a result, a positive cumulative bias is introduced in the number. In the MATLAB® software, you can round to ceiling using the ceil function.
Seems that it's intended change. The JDK 1.7 behavior was incorrect.
The problem is that you simply cannot represent the number 10.55555 using the double type. It stores the data in IEEE binary format, so when you assign the decimal 10.55555 number to the double variable, you actually get the closest value which can be represented in IEEE format: 10.555550000000000210320649784989655017852783203125. This number is bigger than 10.55555, so it's correctly rounded to 10.5556 in HALF_DOWN mode.
You can check some numbers which can be exactly represented in binary. For example, 10.15625 (which is 10 + 5/32, thus 1010.00101 in binary). This number is rounded to 10.1562 in HALF_DOWN mode and 10.1563 in HALF_UP mode.
If you want to restore the old behavior, you can first convert your number to BigDecimal using BigDecimal.valueOf constructor, which "translates a double into a BigDecimal, using the double's canonical string representation":
BigDecimal toFormat = BigDecimal.valueOf(10.55555);
System.out.println("Round down");
System.out.println(format.format(toFormat)); // 10.5555
format.setRoundingMode(RoundingMode.HALF_UP);
toFormat = BigDecimal.valueOf(10.55555);
System.out.println("Round up");
System.out.println(format.format(toFormat)); // 10.5556
                        The change of behaviour is documented in the release notes of Java 8
When using the
NumberFormatandDecimalFormatclasses, the rounding behavior of previous versions of the JDK was wrong in some corner cases. [...]As an example, when using the default recommended
NumberFormatFormatAPI form:NumberFormat nf = java.text.NumberFormat.getInstance()followed bynf.format(0.8055d), the value 0.8055d is recorded in the computer as 0.80549999999999999378275106209912337362766265869140625 since this value cannot be represented exactly in the binary format. Here, the default rounding rule is "half-even", and the result of calling format() in JDK 7 is a wrong output of "0.806", while the correct result is "0.805", since the value recorded in memory by the computer is "below" the tie.This new behavior is also implemented for all rounding positions that might be defined by any pattern chosen by the programmer (non default patterns).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With