I recently started migrating things from jQ to a more structured framework being VueJS, and I love it!
Conceptually, Vuex has been a bit of a paradigm shift for me, but I'm confident I know what its all about now, and totally get it! But there exist a few little grey areas, mostly from an implementation standpoint.
This one I feel is good by design, but don't know if it contradicts the Vuex cycle of uni-directional data flow.
Basically, is it considered good practice to return a promise(-like) object from an action? I treat these as async wrappers, with states of failure and the like, so seems like a good fit to return a promise. Contrarily mutators just change things, and are the pure structures within a store/module.
To use async and await with Vuex dispatch, we can add an action method that's an async function.
In Vuex, actions are functions that call mutations. Actions exist because mutations must be synchronous, whereas actions can be asynchronous. You can define actions by passing a POJO as the actions property to the Vuex store constructor as shown below. To "call" an action, you should use the Store#dispatch() function.
You can call another Vuex action by passing the name of that action as a string as the first argument of dispatch : const store = new Vuex. Store({ actions: { walk(context) { context. dispatch("goForward"); }, goForward(context) { // }, }, });
actions
in Vuex are asynchronous. The only way to let the calling function (initiator of action) to know that an action is complete - is by returning a Promise and resolving it later.
Here is an example: myAction
returns a Promise
, makes a http call and resolves or rejects the Promise
later - all asynchronously
actions: {
myAction(context, data) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
// Do something here... lets say, a http call using vue-resource
this.$http("/api/something").then(response => {
// http success, call the mutator and change something in state
resolve(response); // Let the calling function know that http is done. You may send some data back
}, error => {
// http failed, let the calling function know that action did not work out
reject(error);
})
})
}
}
Now, when your Vue component initiates myAction
, it will get this Promise object and can know whether it succeeded or not. Here is some sample code for the Vue component:
export default {
mounted: function() {
// This component just got created. Lets fetch some data here using an action
this.$store.dispatch("myAction").then(response => {
console.log("Got some data, now lets show something in this component")
}, error => {
console.error("Got nothing from server. Prompt user to check internet connection and try again")
})
}
}
As you can see above, it is highly beneficial for actions
to return a Promise
. Otherwise there is no way for the action initiator to know what is happening and when things are stable enough to show something on the user interface.
And a last note regarding mutators
- as you rightly pointed out, they are synchronous. They change stuff in the state
, and are usually called from actions
. There is no need to mix Promises
with mutators
, as the actions
handle that part.
Edit: My views on the Vuex cycle of uni-directional data flow:
If you access data like this.$store.state["your data key"]
in your components, then the data flow is uni-directional.
The promise from action is only to let the component know that action is complete.
The component may either take data from promise resolve function in the above example (not uni-directional, therefore not recommended), or directly from $store.state["your data key"]
which is unidirectional and follows the vuex data lifecycle.
The above paragraph assumes your mutator uses Vue.set(state, "your data key", http_data)
, once the http call is completed in your action.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With