I know that there is no return type of the constructors in C++
However, the code below compiles right. What is returned by the constructor in the code below?
class A{
public:
A() {}
}
A a = A(); //what is returned by A() here, why?
Is there any conflict here?
A constructor doesn't have any return type. The data type of the value retuned by a method may vary, return type of a method indicates this value. A constructor doesn't return any values explicitly, it returns the instance of the class to which it belongs.
Constructors are almost similar to methods except for two things - its name is the same as the class name and it has no return type. Sometimes constructors are also referred to as special methods to initialize an object.
Note that the constructor name must match the class name, and it cannot have a return type (like void ). Also note that the constructor is called when the object is created.
1. What is the return type of Constructors? Explanation: Constructors does not have any return type, not even void.
Nothing is returned from the constructor. The syntax A()
is not a constructor call, it creates a temporary object of type A
(and calls the constructor in the process).
You can't call a constructor directly, constructors are called as a part of object construction.
In your code, during the construction of the temporary the default constructor (the one you defined) is called. Then, during the construction of a
, the copy constructor (generated automatically by the compiler) is called with the temporary as an argument.
As Greg correctly points out, in some circumstances (including this one), the compiler is allowed to avoid the copy-construction and default-construct a
(the copy-constructor must be accessible however). I know of no compiler that wouldn't perform such optimization.
The syntax T()
, where T
is some type, is a functional-cast notation that creates a value-initialized object of type T
. This does not necessarily involve a constructor (it might or it might not). For example, the int()
is a perfectly valid expression and type int
has no constructors. In any case, even if type T
has a constructor, to interpret T()
as "something returned from constructor" is simply incorrect. This is not a constructor call.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With