In another post regarding resizing of a sparse matrix in SciPy the accepted answer works when more rows or columns are to be added, using scipy.sparse.vstack
or hstack
, respectively. In SciPy 0.12 the reshape
or set_shape
methods are still not implemented.
Are there some stabilished good practices to reshape a sparse matrix in SciPy 0.12? It would be nice to have some timing comparisons.
I don't know of any established good practices, so here's a fairly straight-forward reshape function for a coo_matrix. It converts its argument to a coo_matrix, so it will actual work for other sparse formats (but it returns a coo_matrix).
from scipy.sparse import coo_matrix
def reshape(a, shape):
"""Reshape the sparse matrix `a`.
Returns a coo_matrix with shape `shape`.
"""
if not hasattr(shape, '__len__') or len(shape) != 2:
raise ValueError('`shape` must be a sequence of two integers')
c = a.tocoo()
nrows, ncols = c.shape
size = nrows * ncols
new_size = shape[0] * shape[1]
if new_size != size:
raise ValueError('total size of new array must be unchanged')
flat_indices = ncols * c.row + c.col
new_row, new_col = divmod(flat_indices, shape[1])
b = coo_matrix((c.data, (new_row, new_col)), shape=shape)
return b
Example:
In [43]: a = coo_matrix([[0,10,0,0],[0,0,0,0],[0,20,30,40]])
In [44]: a.A
Out[44]:
array([[ 0, 10, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 20, 30, 40]])
In [45]: b = reshape(a, (2,6))
In [46]: b.A
Out[46]:
array([[ 0, 10, 0, 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0, 20, 30, 40]])
Now, I'm sure there are several regular contributors here who can come up with something better (faster, more memory efficient, less filling... :)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With