Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Removing many to many entity Framework

There is a many to many relationship between Artist and ArtistType. I can easily add artist ArtistType like below

foreach (var artistType in this._db.ArtistTypes
    .Where(artistType => vm.SelectedIds.Contains(artistType.ArtistTypeID)))
{
    artist.ArtistTypes.Add(artistType);
}

_db.ArtistDetails.Add(artist);
_db.SaveChanges();

This goes and updates the many to many association table with correct mapping. But when I try to remove any item from table I do not get any error but it does not remove it from the table?

foreach (var artistType in this._db.ArtistTypes
    .Where(at => vm.SelectedIds.Contains(at.ArtistTypeID)))
{
    artistDetail.ArtistTypes.Remove(artistType);
}

this._db.Entry(artistDetail).State = EntityState.Modified;
this._db.SaveChanges();

What am I missing?

like image 561
akd Avatar asked Nov 18 '13 16:11

akd


People also ask

How does Entity Framework handle many-to-many relationships?

To configure many-to-many relationship Using Data Annotations, you need to create the Join Table in the model. The Join Table BookCategory will have properties for the primary key of both the table. It will have two navigational properties one each for Book and Category class.

How do I use RemoveRange in Entity Framework?

RemoveRange() method attaches a collection of entities with Deleted state, which in turn will execute the DELETE command for all entities on SaveChanges() . Adding or removing entities using the AddRange and RemoveRange methods improves the performance.

How do I delete a record in Entity Framework?

Delete a Record In Connected Scenario, you can use the Remove or RemoveRange method to mark the record as Deleted . In Disconnected Scenario, you can attach it to the context and set its state as Deleted . Calling SaveChanges will send the delete query to the database.

Which method is used to let the DbContext know an entity should be deleted?

DbContext. Remove Method (Microsoft.


2 Answers

Standard way is to load the artist including the current related types from the database and then remove the types with the selected Ids from the loaded types collection. Change tracking will recognize which types have been removed and write the correct DELETE statements to the join table:

var artist = this._db.Artists.Include(a => a.ArtistTypes)     .SingleOrDefault(a => a.ArtistID == someArtistID);  if (artist != null) {     foreach (var artistType in artist.ArtistTypes         .Where(at => vm.SelectedIds.Contains(at.ArtistTypeID)).ToList())     {         artist.ArtistTypes.Remove(artistType);     }     this._db.SaveChanges();         } 
like image 127
Slauma Avatar answered Sep 30 '22 13:09

Slauma


For removing only one field, I came up with this solution. It seems odd but in EF, most of the things are odd anyway because we try to tell EF the database ops in terms of OOP.

using (var db = new Context())
{
    //Create existing entities without fetch:
    var artist = new Artist() { ArtistID = _artistID };
    var type = new Type() { TypeID = _typeID };

    //Add one entity to other's list 
    //This is in memory, not connected.
    //So we do this because we try to tell EF that we want to remove this item
    //Without fetch, we should add it first in order to remove :)
    artist.ArtistTypes.Add(type);

    //Attach that entity which you add an item to its list:
    db.Artists.Attach(artist); 
    //It's now connected and recognized by EF as database operation

    //After attaching, remove that item from list and save db
    artist.ArtistTypes.Remove(type);
    db.SaveChanges();
}

That's it! With this solution, you are no longer fetching all entries of joined table ArtistTypes.

like image 40
ninbit Avatar answered Sep 30 '22 13:09

ninbit