Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Remove and restore Scope from digest cycles

Is there a way to remove a scope from the digest cycles? In other words, to suspend/resume a scope digest cycle?

In my case, I have all pages already loaded, but not all of them visible. So I'd like to suspend the ones that aren't visible to avoid useless processing. I don't want to use ng-view + $route, I don't want/need deep-linking.

I saw this thread and arrived to this fiddle. It probably does the work, but it's pretty invasive and not very framework-update-friendly.

Is there any other solution like a $scope.suspend() and scope.resume()? Or a less invasive one (from framework perspective)? I'm currently thinking about $destroy and $compile cycles.

like image 260
Caio Cunha Avatar asked Jan 31 '13 13:01

Caio Cunha


2 Answers

I've ran into the same problem and I found an interesting solution that doesn't interfere (too much) with AngularJS. Add this to the scopes you want to disable:

var watchers;

scope.$on('suspend', function () {
  watchers = scope.$$watchers;
  scope.$$watchers = [];
});

scope.$on('resume', function () {
  scope.$$watchers = watchers;
  watchers = null;
});

Then, you can disable a scope and its children with: scope.$broadcast('suspend') and bring it back with scope.$broadcast('resume').

like image 179
Laurent Perrin Avatar answered Oct 14 '22 07:10

Laurent Perrin


As the framework stands today there are no methods to suspend / resume digest on a scope. Having said this there are several techniques that one can use to limit number of watches that are executed as part of a digest cycle.

First of all, if parts of a screen are hidden anyway you could use the ng-switch family of directives thus removing invisible parts completely from the DOM.

Secondly, if a digest cycle is triggered from your directive via $apply and you want to limit watches re-evaluation to child scopes you could call $digest instead of $apply.

Then, yes, one could destroy and re-create scopes as described in the discussion you've linked to. But, if you are already hiding parts of the DOM it sounds like ng-switch might be a better option.

like image 3
pkozlowski.opensource Avatar answered Oct 14 '22 06:10

pkozlowski.opensource