Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

'ref' keyword and AppDomains

Tags:

c#

remoting

When I started using C# I was unsure of how references were treated exactly (whether they were being passed by value etc.). I wrongly thought the 'ref' keyword was needed when passing objects that would be modified by the called method.

Then after reading threads like this, I realized 'ref' was only needed when you need to change the actual reference / pointer itself.

But today I have come across an issue when passing a parameter via a remoting call, where ref was actually needed to modify the content of the object. When passed without ref, the object came back unchanged. I was told to add the ref keyword but I argued for a while that it was only necessary when you change the pointer itself, not the content that is being pointed to.

I have searched the net and could only find a single page that discusses it briefly. Is this a known issue and is anyone able to point to some documentation about it? It seems to me that I will have to use ref now for any parameter that is being modified via a remoting call.

like image 403
LegendLength Avatar asked May 08 '09 03:05

LegendLength


2 Answers

I wonder why did you say "reference/pointer"?. There's a big difference between those terms. See, a pointer is just an address, say an int.

On the other hand, a reference is nothing but an alias to something. In terms of C++:

int x;
int& y = x;

From here on, whatever happens to x, happens to y and viceversa, they are bound "forever".

Again, in C++, a pass-by-ref:

void foo(int& y);
int main(){
    int x = 0;
    foo(x);
}

It means that y, is just another name (alias) for x within foo's scope. This is what ref means in C#.

like image 38
Anzurio Avatar answered Oct 04 '22 02:10

Anzurio


Adding "ref" might, or might not help. It all depends on the smartness of the particular marshaller implementation. If you call, for example, a web service, no amount of "ref"s is going to help you -- the parameters of the function are simply not sent back over the wire. The only thing that comes back from the service is the function's return value. When dealing with remoting you have to understand (at least to some degree) the way things actually work -- the fact that parameters need to be serialized and sent to the callee over some sort of "wire", deserialized on the other end, work is performed by the server, and the results serialized and sent back to you. Whether these results include changes to the parameters you passed in the first place depends more on the specific remoting implementation, then on the "ref"s that you add to decorate your parameters...

like image 85
user8032 Avatar answered Oct 04 '22 02:10

user8032