I'm using persistent volume claim to store data in container:
kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: test-pvc
labels:
type: amazonEBS
spec:
accessModes:
- ReadWriteOnce
resources:
requests:
storage: 5Gi
Declaration in spec:
spec:
volumes:
- name: test-data-vol
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: test-pvc
containers:
- name: test
image: my.docker.registry/test:1.0
volumeMounts:
- mountPath: /var/data
name: test-data-vol
When I started it first time, this volume was mounted correctly. But when I Tried to update container image:
- image: my.docker.registry/test:1.0
+ image: my.docker.registry/test:1.1
This volume failed to mount to new pod:
# kubectl get pods
test-7655b79cb6-cgn5r 0/1 ContainerCreating 0 3m
test-bf6498559-42vvb 1/1 Running 0 11m
# kubectl describe test-7655b79cb6-cgn5r
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal Scheduled 3m5s default-scheduler Successfully assigned test-7655b79cb6-cgn5r to ip-*-*-*-*.us-west-2.compute.internal
Warning FailedAttachVolume 3m5s attachdetach-controller Multi-Attach error for volume "pvc-2312eb4c-c270-11e8-8d4e-065333a7774e" Volume is already exclusively attached to one node and can't be attached to another
Normal SuccessfulMountVolume 3m4s kubelet, ip-*-*-*-*.us-west-2.compute.internal MountVolume.SetUp succeeded for volume "default-token-x82km"
Warning FailedMount 62s kubelet, ip-*-*-*-*.us-west-2.compute.internal Unable to mount volumes for pod "test-7655b79cb6-cgn5r(fab0862c-d1cf-11e8-8d4e-065333a7774e)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "test-7655b79cb6-cgn5r". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[test-data-vol]
It seems that Kubernetes can't re-attach this volume from one container to another. How to handle it correctly? I need this data on volume to be used by new version of deployment when old version stopped.
From the context you provided in your question, I can't tell if your intention was to run a single instance stateful application, or a clustered stateful application.
I ran into this problem recently and from this section in the docs, here's how to go about this...
If you're running a single instance stateful app:
spec.replicas as 1 if you're using a Deployment
spec.strategy.type to Recreate in your Deployment
Sample Deployment (from the docs):
# application/mysql/mysql-deployment.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1 # for versions before 1.9.0 use apps/v1beta2
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: mysql
spec:
selector:
matchLabels:
app: mysql
strategy:
type: Recreate
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: mysql
spec:
containers:
- image: mysql:5.6
name: mysql
env:
# Use secret in real usage
- name: MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD
value: password
ports:
- containerPort: 3306
name: mysql
volumeMounts:
- name: mysql-persistent-storage
mountPath: /var/lib/mysql
volumes:
- name: mysql-persistent-storage
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: mysql-pv-claim
And the sample PersistentVolume & PersistentVolumeClaim (from the docs):
# application/mysql/mysql-pv.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolume
metadata:
name: mysql-pv-volume
labels:
type: local
spec:
storageClassName: manual
capacity:
storage: 20Gi
accessModes:
- ReadWriteOnce
hostPath:
path: "/mnt/data"
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
metadata:
name: mysql-pv-claim
spec:
storageClassName: manual
accessModes:
- ReadWriteOnce
resources:
requests:
storage: 20Gi
The obvious underlying matter here is that a rolling update will not work, because there can be no more than one pod running at any time. Setting spec.strategy.type to Recreate tells Kubernetes to stop the running pod before deploying a new one, so presumably there will be some downtime, even if minimal.
If you need a clustered stateful application, then using the already mentioned StatefulSet as a controller type or ReadWriteMany as a storage type would probably be the way to go.
The issue here is that EBS volumes are ReadWriteOnce and can only be mounted to a single pod, so when you do the rolling update the old pod holds the volume. For this to work you would either have to use StatefulSet or you can use any of the ReadWriteMany PV types.
A Kubernetes Deployment is sometimes better used for stateless pods.
You can always go with the brute force approach which force delete the pod that is holding the volume. Make sure that the Reclaim Policy is set to Retain.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With