I am using a pipeline to perform feature selection and hyperparameter optimization using RandomizedSearchCV
. Here is a summary of the code:
from sklearn.cross_validation import train_test_split
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.feature_selection import SelectKBest
from sklearn.grid_search import RandomizedSearchCV
from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline
from scipy.stats import randint as sp_randint
rng = 44
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test =
train_test_split(data[features], data['target'], random_state=rng)
clf = RandomForestClassifier(random_state=rng)
kbest = SelectKBest()
pipe = make_pipeline(kbest,clf)
upLim = X_train.shape[1]
param_dist = {'selectkbest__k':sp_randint(upLim/2,upLim+1),
'randomforestclassifier__n_estimators': sp_randint(5,150),
'randomforestclassifier__max_depth': [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, None],
'randomforestclassifier__criterion': ["gini", "entropy"],
'randomforestclassifier__max_features': ['auto', 'sqrt', 'log2']}
clf_opt = RandomizedSearchCV(pipe, param_distributions= param_dist,
scoring='roc_auc', n_jobs=1, cv=3, random_state=rng)
clf_opt.fit(X_train,y_train)
y_pred = clf_opt.predict(X_test)
I am using a constant random_state
for the train_test_split
, RandomForestClassifer
, and RandomizedSearchCV
. However, the result of the above code is slightly different if I run it several times. More specifically, I have several test units in my code and these slightly different results leads to failure of the test units. Should not I obtain the same results because of using the same random_state
? Am I missing anything in my code that creates randomness in a part of the code?
The random state hyperparameter in the train_test_split() function controls the shuffling process. With random_state=None , we get different train and test sets across different executions and the shuffling process is out of control. With random_state=0 , we get the same train and test sets across different executions.
train_test_split), is recommended to used the parameter ( random_state=42) to produce the same results across a different run.
A random forest is a meta estimator that fits a number of decision tree classifiers on various sub-samples of the dataset and uses averaging to improve the predictive accuracy and control over-fitting.
42 is the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. On a serious note, random_state simply sets a seed to the random generator, so that your train-test splits are always deterministic.
I usually answer my own questions! I will leave it here for others with similar question:
To make sure that I am avoiding any randomness, I defined a random seed. The code is as follows:
from sklearn.cross_validation import train_test_split
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.feature_selection import SelectKBest
from sklearn.grid_search import RandomizedSearchCV
from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline
from scipy.stats import randint as sp_randint
seed = np.random.seed(22)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test =
train_test_split(data[features], data['target'])
clf = RandomForestClassifier()
kbest = SelectKBest()
pipe = make_pipeline(kbest,clf)
upLim = X_train.shape[1]
param_dist = {'selectkbest__k':sp_randint(upLim/2,upLim+1),
'randomforestclassifier__n_estimators': sp_randint(5,150),
'randomforestclassifier__max_depth': [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, None],
'randomforestclassifier__criterion': ["gini", "entropy"],
'randomforestclassifier__max_features': ['auto', 'sqrt', 'log2']}
clf_opt = RandomizedSearchCV(pipe, param_distributions= param_dist,
scoring='roc_auc', n_jobs=1, cv=3)
clf_opt.fit(X_train,y_train)
y_pred = clf_opt.predict(X_test)
I hope it can help others!
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With