I'm creating an R package that will use a single function from plyr
. According to this roxygen2 vignette:
If you are using just a few functions from another package, the recommended option is to note the package name in the Imports: field of the DESCRIPTION file and call the function(s) explicitly using ::, e.g., pkg::fun().
That sounds good. I'm using plyr::ldply()
- the full call with ::
- so I list plyr
in Imports:
in my DESCRIPTION
file. However, when I use devtools::check()
I get this:
* checking dependencies in R code ... NOTE
All declared Imports should be used:
‘plyr’
All declared Imports should be used.
Why do I get this note?
I am able to avoid the note by adding @importFrom dplyr ldply
in the file that is using plyr
, but then I end but having ldply
in my package namespace. Which I do not want, and should not need as I am using plyr::ldply()
the single time I use the function.
Any pointers would be appreciated!
(This question might be relevant.)
If ldply()
is important for your package's functionality, then you do want it in your package namespace. That is the point of namespace imports. Functions that you need, should be in the package namespace because this is where R will look first for the definition of functions, before then traversing the base namespace and the attached packages. It means that no matter what other packages are loaded or unloaded, attached or unattached, your package will always have access to that function. In such cases, use:
@importFrom plyr ldply
And you can just refer to ldply()
without the plyr::
prefix just as if it were another function in your package.
If ldply()
is not so important - perhaps it is called only once in a not commonly used function - then, Writing R Extensions 1.5.1 gives the following advice:
If a package only needs a few objects from another package it can use a fully qualified variable reference in the code instead of a formal import. A fully qualified reference to the function
f
in packagefoo
is of the formfoo::f
. This is slightly less efficient than a formal import and also loses the advantage of recording all dependencies in theNAMESPACE
file (but they still need to be recorded in theDESCRIPTION
file). Evaluatingfoo::f
will cause packagefoo
to be loaded, but not attached, if it was not loaded already—this can be an advantage in delaying the loading of a rarely used package.
(I think this advice is actually a little outdated because it is implying more separation between DESCRIPTION
and NAMESPACE
than currently exists.) It implies you should use @import plyr
and refer to the function as plyr::ldply()
. But in reality, it's actually suggesting something like putting plyr
in the Suggests
field of DESCRIPTION
, which isn't exactly accommodated by roxygen2 markup nor exactly compliant with R CMD check
.
In sum, the official line is that Hadley's advice (which you are quoting) is only preferred for rarely used functions from rarely used packages (and/or packages that take a considerable amount of time to load). Otherwise, just do @importFrom
like WRE advises:
Using
importFrom
selectively rather thanimport
is good practice and recommended notably when importing from packages with more than a dozen exports.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With