I am trying to build a Python module in C++ that transforms a 2D vector into a Numpy 2D array. What is incorrect here - presumably there is some transformation needed to a boost python object from PyObject*?
boost::python::object build_day(int year, int day) {
PyObject* arr;
const int HEIGHT = 5;
const int WIDTH = 5;
std::vector<std::vector<float> > array(WIDTH, std::vector<float>(HEIGHT));
npy_intp dims[2] = {WIDTH, HEIGHT};
arr = PyArray_SimpleNewFromData(2, dims, NPY_FLOAT, &array);
return arr;
}
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(sumpar) {
using namespace boost::python;
def("build_day", build_day, args("year", "day"));
}
The boost::python::object
provides a generalized interface to Python objects. To construct one from a PyObject*
, one must first construct a boost::python::handle<>
, which is essentially a smart pointer designed to manage reference-counted Python objects (PyObject*
or derived types). One often uses handle<>
between the boundary between Boost.Python's higher-level code and the Python/C API.
namespace python = boost::python;
PyObject* py_object = get_py_object();
python::handle<> handle(py_object);
boost::python object(handle);
Note that the handle
will share ownership of the PyObject*
, and during destruction, it will decrease the reference count on the PyObject
it is managing. Thus, during construction, it is important to specify whether or not handle<>
needs to increase the reference count of PyObject*
.
If PyObject
has already had its reference count increased, then use:
namespace python = boost::python;
PyObject* py_object = ...;
python::handle<> handle(py_object);
python::object object(handle);
If PyObject
has not had its reference count increased, and the handle must do it, then use the borrowed()
function during construction:
namespace python = boost::python;
PyObject* py_object = ...;
python::handle<> handle(python::borrowed(py_object));
python::object object(handle);
Here is a complete example demonstrating constructing a boost::python::object
from a PyObject*
:
#include <vector>
#include <boost/python.hpp>
// Mocks...
enum { NPY_FLOAT };
typedef int npy_intp;
PyObject* PyArray_SimpleNewFromData(int, npy_intp*, int, void*)
{
return PyString_FromString("hello world");
}
boost::python::object build_day(int year, int day)
{
const int HEIGHT = 5;
const int WIDTH = 5;
std::vector<std::vector<float> > array(
WIDTH, std::vector<float>(HEIGHT));
npy_intp dims[2] = {WIDTH, HEIGHT};
namespace python = boost::python;
PyObject* arr = PyArray_SimpleNewFromData(2, dims, NPY_FLOAT, &array);
python::handle<> handle(arr);
return python::object(handle);
}
BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(example)
{
namespace python = boost::python;
python::def("build_day", &build_day, python::args("year", "day"));
}
Interactive usage:
>>> import example
>>> day = example.build_day(1, 2);
>>> assert(day)
Note that to create a minimal complete example, the above example has a mocked PyArray_SimpleNewFromData()
that simply returns Python string. It is important to consult the documentation to determine if the PyObject*
is borrowed or not, and if there are any lifetime requirements between the object and its arguments. In the case of PyArray_SimpleNewFromData()
, the returned PyObject*
:
PyObject
. The build_day()
function in the original question fails to meet this requirement.If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With