>>> [l for l in range(2,100) if litheor(l)!=l in sieve(100)]
[2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 89, 97]
>>> 2 in sieve(100)
True
>>> litheor(2)
True
So litheor(2)
is True
and 2 in sieve(100)
is True
, so the if
clause in the list comprehension is False
. But why is 2
still in the output of the list comprehension?
Ok, at first it sounds crazy, but:
>>> True != 2 in [2,3,5]
True
>>> (True != 2) in [2,3,5]
False
>>> True != (2 in [2,3,5])
False
When you realise that this is not a simple precedence issue, looking at the AST is the only remaining option:
>>> ast.dump(ast.parse("True != 2 in [2,3,5]"))
"Module(body=[Expr(value=
Compare(left=Name(id='True', ctx=Load()), ops=[NotEq(), In()], comparators=[Num(n=2), List(elts=[Num(n=2), Num(n=3), Num(n=5)], ctx=Load())])
)])"
And here is a little hint:
>>> ast.dump(ast.parse("1 < 2 <= 3"))
'Module(body=[Expr(value=
Compare(left=Num(n=1), ops=[Lt(), LtE()], comparators=[Num(n=2), Num(n=3)])
)])'
So, it turns out, True != 2 in [2,3,5]
is interpreted similar to 1 < 2 <= 3
. And your expression
litheor(l) != l in sieve(100)
means
litheor(l) != l and l in sieve(100)
which is True
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With