Is there a Python module where I can create objects with a geographical location coordinate (latitude and longitude), and query all the objects for ones which are within a 5km distance (i.e. radius) of a given coordinate?
I've been trying to store the latitude and longitude as keys in dictionaries (as they're indexed by key) and use some distance finding algorithms to query them. But this feels like a horrible hack.
Essentially something like PostGIS for PostgreSQL, but all within my Python app's memory.
We can get GPS coordinates from python using geopy if the location is provided. The location can be provided using Nominatim from geopy and then latitude and longitude can be extracted. To know if the library is successfully installed or not, the following output will be shown on the terminal.
Yes, try geopy.
import geopy
import geopy.distance
pt1 = geopy.Point(48.853, 2.349)
pt2 = geopy.Point(52.516, 13.378)
dist = geopy.distance.distance(pt1, pt2).km
# 878.25
afterwards you can query your lists of points:
[pt for pt in points if geopy.distance.distance(orig, pt).km < 5.]
I know this isn't exactly what you meant, but you could use GeoDjango with an in-memory SQLite database. It's a full set of GIS tools exposed as a Web application, which makes it a Swiss Army knife for rapidly developing GIS applications, especially for small ad hoc queries.
The usual approach in GIS is to create a buffer around the point of interest and query the intersection. As @RyanDalton suggests, if you plan to do a lot of geolocation stuff, use Shapely, the GIS API for Python. It is good to know about Shapely even if you still want a spatial index (see below). Here is how to create buffers in Shapely:
distance = 3
center = Point(1, 1)
pts = [Point(1.1, 1.2),Point(1.2,1.2)]
center_buf = a.buffer(distance)
#filters the points list according to whether they are contained in the list
contained = filter(center_buf.contains,pts)
You can index your points yourself (let's say by longitude for example) if you don't have many. Otherwise you can also use the Rtree package, check the link called Using Rtree as a cheapo spatial database!
Your dictionary idea doesn't sound that bad, though you will need to check points that fall under 'neighbouring' dictionary keys as well.
If you can't find the right tool, and like coding algorithms, you could implement a binary space partition tree which afaik is a less hacky way of achieving a similar thing.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With