python decimal comparison
>>> from decimal import Decimal
>>> Decimal('1.0') > 2.0
True
I was expecting it to convert 2.0 correctly, but after reading thru PEP 327 I understand there were some reason for not implictly converting float to Decimal, but shouldn't in that case it should raise TypeError as it does in this case
>>> Decimal('1.0') + 2.0
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 1, in <string>
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'Decimal' and 'float'
so does all other operator / - % // etc
so my questions are
System details: Python 2.5.2 on Ubuntu 8.04.1
In Python, to print 2 decimal places we will use str. format() with “{:. 2f}” as string and float as a number. Call print and it will print the float with 2 decimal places.
How To Compare Floats in Python. If abs(a - b) is smaller than some percentage of the larger of a or b , then a is considered sufficiently close to b to be "equal" to b . This percentage is called the relative tolerance. You can specify the relative tolerance with the rel_tol keyword argument of math.
Re 1, it's indeed the behavior we designed -- right or wrong as it may be (sorry if that trips your use case up, but we were trying to be general!).
Specifically, it's long been the case that every Python object could be subject to inequality comparison with every other -- objects of types that aren't really comparable get arbitrarily compared (consistently in a given run, not necessarily across runs); main use case was sorting a heterogeneous list to group elements in it by type.
An exception was introduced for complex numbers only, making them non-comparable to anything -- but that was still many years ago, when we were occasionally cavalier about breaking perfectly good user code. Nowadays we're much stricter about backwards compatibility within a major release (e.g. along the 2.*
line, and separately along the 3.*
one, though incompatibilities are allowed between 2 and 3 -- indeed that's the whole point of having a 3.*
series, letting us fix past design decisions even in incompatible ways).
The arbitrary comparisons turned out to be more trouble than they're worth, causing user confusion; and the grouping by type can now be obtained easily e.g. with a key=lambda x: str(type(x))
argument to sort
; so in Python 3 comparisons between objects of different types, unless the objects themselves specifically allow it in the comparison methods, does raise an exception:
>>> decimal.Decimal('2.0') > 1.2
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: unorderable types: Decimal() > float()
In other words, in Python 3 this behaves exactly as you think it should; but in Python 2 it doesn't (and never will in any Python 2.*
).
Re 2, you'll be fine -- though, look to gmpy for what I hope is an interesting way to convert doubles to infinite-precision fractions through Farey trees. If the prices you're dealing with are precise to no more than cents, use '%.2f' % x
rather than repr(x)
!-)
Rather than a subclass of Decimal, I'd use a factory function such as
def to_decimal(float_price):
return decimal.Decimal('%.2f' % float_price)
since, once produced, the resulting Decimal is a perfectly ordinary one.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With