In python classes, the @property is a nice decorator that avoids using explicit setter and getter functions. However, it comes at a cost of an overhead 2-5 times that of a "classical" class function. In my case, this is quite OK in the case of setting a property, where the overhead is insignificant compared to the processing that needs to be done when setting.
However, I need no processing when getting the property. It is always just "return self.property". Is there an elegant way to use the setter but not using the getter, without needing to use a different internal variable?
Just to illustrate, the class below has the property "var" which refers to the internal variable "_var". It takes longer to call "var" than "_var" but it would be nice if developers and users alike could just use "var" without having to keep track of "_var" too.
class MyClass(object): def __init__(self): self._var = None # the property "var". First the getter, then the setter @property def var(self): return self._var @var.setter def var(self, newValue): self._var = newValue #... and a lot of other stuff here # Use "var" a lot! How to avoid the overhead of the getter and not to call self._var! def useAttribute(self): for i in xrange(100000): self.var == 'something'
For those interested, on my pc calling "var" takes 204 ns on average while calling "_var" takes 44 ns on average.
Getters and Setters in python are often used when: We use getters & setters to add validation logic around getting and setting a value. To avoid direct access of a class field i.e. private variables cannot be accessed directly or modified by external user.
Let's write the same implementation in a Pythonic way. You don't need any getters, setters methods to access or change the attributes. You can access it directly using the name of the attributes.
Some data members should be read-only, so they may need getters but not setters. Some data members may need to be kept consistent with each other. In such a case you would not provide a setter for each one, but a single method for setting them at the same time, so that you can check the values for consistency.
Python programming provides us with a built-in @property decorator which makes usage of getter and setters much easier in Object-Oriented Programming.
Don't use a property
in this case. A property
object is a data descriptor, which means that any access to instance.var
will invoke that descriptor and Python will never look for an attribute on the instance itself.
You have two options: use the .__setattr__()
hook or build a descriptor that only implements .__set__
.
.__setattr__()
hookclass MyClass(object): var = 'foo' def __setattr__(self, name, value): if name == 'var': print "Setting var!" # do something with `value` here, like you would in a # setter. value = 'Set to ' + value super(MyClass, self).__setattr__(name, value)
Now normal attribute lookups are used when reading .var
but when assigning to .var
the __setattr__
method is invoked instead, letting you intercept value
and adjust it as needed.
Demo:
>>> mc = MyClass() >>> mc.var 'foo' >>> mc.var = 'bar' Setting var! >>> mc.var 'Set to bar'
A setter descriptor would only intercept variable assignment:
class SetterProperty(object): def __init__(self, func, doc=None): self.func = func self.__doc__ = doc if doc is not None else func.__doc__ def __set__(self, obj, value): return self.func(obj, value) class Foo(object): @SetterProperty def var(self, value): print 'Setting var!' self.__dict__['var'] = value
Note how we need to assign to the instance .__dict__
attribute to prevent invoking the setter again.
Demo:
>>> f = Foo() >>> f.var = 'spam' Setting var! >>> f.var = 'ham' Setting var! >>> f.var 'ham' >>> f.var = 'biggles' Setting var! >>> f.var 'biggles'
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With