Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Python class @property: use setter but evade getter?

In python classes, the @property is a nice decorator that avoids using explicit setter and getter functions. However, it comes at a cost of an overhead 2-5 times that of a "classical" class function. In my case, this is quite OK in the case of setting a property, where the overhead is insignificant compared to the processing that needs to be done when setting.

However, I need no processing when getting the property. It is always just "return self.property". Is there an elegant way to use the setter but not using the getter, without needing to use a different internal variable?

Just to illustrate, the class below has the property "var" which refers to the internal variable "_var". It takes longer to call "var" than "_var" but it would be nice if developers and users alike could just use "var" without having to keep track of "_var" too.

class MyClass(object):   def __init__(self):     self._var = None    # the property "var". First the getter, then the setter   @property   def var(self):     return self._var   @var.setter   def var(self, newValue):     self._var = newValue     #... and a lot of other stuff here    # Use "var" a lot! How to avoid the overhead of the getter and not to call self._var!   def useAttribute(self):     for i in xrange(100000):       self.var == 'something' 

For those interested, on my pc calling "var" takes 204 ns on average while calling "_var" takes 44 ns on average.

like image 421
Jonas Lindeløv Avatar asked Jul 10 '13 16:07

Jonas Lindeløv


People also ask

What is the more pythonic way to use getters and setters?

Getters and Setters in python are often used when: We use getters & setters to add validation logic around getting and setting a value. To avoid direct access of a class field i.e. private variables cannot be accessed directly or modified by external user.

Do Python classes need getters and setters?

Let's write the same implementation in a Pythonic way. You don't need any getters, setters methods to access or change the attributes. You can access it directly using the name of the attributes.

Do getters always need setters?

Some data members should be read-only, so they may need getters but not setters. Some data members may need to be kept consistent with each other. In such a case you would not provide a setter for each one, but a single method for setting them at the same time, so that you can check the values for consistency.

What does @property do in Python class?

Python programming provides us with a built-in @property decorator which makes usage of getter and setters much easier in Object-Oriented Programming.


1 Answers

Don't use a property in this case. A property object is a data descriptor, which means that any access to instance.var will invoke that descriptor and Python will never look for an attribute on the instance itself.

You have two options: use the .__setattr__() hook or build a descriptor that only implements .__set__.

Using the .__setattr__() hook

class MyClass(object):     var = 'foo'      def __setattr__(self, name, value):         if name == 'var':             print "Setting var!"             # do something with `value` here, like you would in a             # setter.             value = 'Set to ' + value         super(MyClass, self).__setattr__(name, value) 

Now normal attribute lookups are used when reading .var but when assigning to .var the __setattr__ method is invoked instead, letting you intercept value and adjust it as needed.

Demo:

>>> mc = MyClass() >>> mc.var 'foo' >>> mc.var = 'bar' Setting var! >>> mc.var 'Set to bar' 

A setter descriptor

A setter descriptor would only intercept variable assignment:

class SetterProperty(object):     def __init__(self, func, doc=None):         self.func = func         self.__doc__ = doc if doc is not None else func.__doc__     def __set__(self, obj, value):         return self.func(obj, value)  class Foo(object):     @SetterProperty     def var(self, value):         print 'Setting var!'         self.__dict__['var'] = value 

Note how we need to assign to the instance .__dict__ attribute to prevent invoking the setter again.

Demo:

>>> f = Foo() >>> f.var = 'spam' Setting var! >>> f.var = 'ham' Setting var! >>> f.var 'ham' >>> f.var = 'biggles' Setting var! >>> f.var 'biggles' 
like image 92
Martijn Pieters Avatar answered Sep 20 '22 21:09

Martijn Pieters