Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Python assigning multiple variables to same value? list behavior

Tags:

python

list

People also ask

Is it possible to assign multiple VAR to values in list?

We generally come through the task of getting certain index values and assigning variables out of them. The general approach we follow is to extract each list element by its index and then assign it to variables. This approach requires more line of code.

Does Python allow you to assign a single value to several variables simultaneously?

Python allows you to assign a single value to several variables simultaneously. Here, two integer objects with values 1 and 2 are assigned to the variables a and b respectively, and one string object with the value "john" is assigned to the variable c.

How do you add multiple variables to a list in Python?

You can use the sequence method list. extend to extend the list by multiple values from any kind of iterable, being it another list or any other thing that provides a sequence of values. So you can use list. append() to append a single value, and list.


If you're coming to Python from a language in the C/Java/etc. family, it may help you to stop thinking about a as a "variable", and start thinking of it as a "name".

a, b, and c aren't different variables with equal values; they're different names for the same identical value. Variables have types, identities, addresses, and all kinds of stuff like that.

Names don't have any of that. Values do, of course, and you can have lots of names for the same value.

If you give Notorious B.I.G. a hot dog,* Biggie Smalls and Chris Wallace have a hot dog. If you change the first element of a to 1, the first elements of b and c are 1.

If you want to know if two names are naming the same object, use the is operator:

>>> a=b=c=[0,3,5]
>>> a is b
True

You then ask:

what is different from this?

d=e=f=3
e=4
print('f:',f)
print('e:',e)

Here, you're rebinding the name e to the value 4. That doesn't affect the names d and f in any way.

In your previous version, you were assigning to a[0], not to a. So, from the point of view of a[0], you're rebinding a[0], but from the point of view of a, you're changing it in-place.

You can use the id function, which gives you some unique number representing the identity of an object, to see exactly which object is which even when is can't help:

>>> a=b=c=[0,3,5]
>>> id(a)
4473392520
>>> id(b)
4473392520
>>> id(a[0])
4297261120
>>> id(b[0])
4297261120

>>> a[0] = 1
>>> id(a)
4473392520
>>> id(b)
4473392520
>>> id(a[0])
4297261216
>>> id(b[0])
4297261216

Notice that a[0] has changed from 4297261120 to 4297261216—it's now a name for a different value. And b[0] is also now a name for that same new value. That's because a and b are still naming the same object.


Under the covers, a[0]=1 is actually calling a method on the list object. (It's equivalent to a.__setitem__(0, 1).) So, it's not really rebinding anything at all. It's like calling my_object.set_something(1). Sure, likely the object is rebinding an instance attribute in order to implement this method, but that's not what's important; what's important is that you're not assigning anything, you're just mutating the object. And it's the same with a[0]=1.


user570826 asked:

What if we have, a = b = c = 10

That's exactly the same situation as a = b = c = [1, 2, 3]: you have three names for the same value.

But in this case, the value is an int, and ints are immutable. In either case, you can rebind a to a different value (e.g., a = "Now I'm a string!"), but the won't affect the original value, which b and c will still be names for. The difference is that with a list, you can change the value [1, 2, 3] into [1, 2, 3, 4] by doing, e.g., a.append(4); since that's actually changing the value that b and c are names for, b will now b [1, 2, 3, 4]. There's no way to change the value 10 into anything else. 10 is 10 forever, just like Claudia the vampire is 5 forever (at least until she's replaced by Kirsten Dunst).


* Warning: Do not give Notorious B.I.G. a hot dog. Gangsta rap zombies should never be fed after midnight.


Cough cough

>>> a,b,c = (1,2,3)
>>> a
1
>>> b
2
>>> c
3
>>> a,b,c = ({'test':'a'},{'test':'b'},{'test':'c'})
>>> a
{'test': 'a'}
>>> b
{'test': 'b'}
>>> c
{'test': 'c'}
>>> 

In python, everything is an object, also "simple" variables types (int, float, etc..).

When you changes a variable value, you actually changes it's pointer, and if you compares between two variables it's compares their pointers. (To be clear, pointer is the address in physical computer memory where a variable is stored).

As a result, when you changes an inner variable value, you changes it's value in the memory and it's affects all the variables that point to this address.

For your example, when you do:

a = b =  5 

This means that a and b points to the same address in memory that contains the value 5, but when you do:

a = 6

It's not affect b because a is now points to another memory location that contains 6 and b still points to the memory address that contains 5.

But, when you do:

a = b = [1,2,3]

a and b, again, points to the same location but the difference is that if you change the one of the list values:

a[0] = 2

It's changes the value of the memory that a is points on, but a is still points to the same address as b, and as a result, b changes as well.


Yes, that's the expected behavior. a, b and c are all set as labels for the same list. If you want three different lists, you need to assign them individually. You can either repeat the explicit list, or use one of the numerous ways to copy a list:

b = a[:] # this does a shallow copy, which is good enough for this case
import copy
c = copy.deepcopy(a) # this does a deep copy, which matters if the list contains mutable objects

Assignment statements in Python do not copy objects - they bind the name to an object, and an object can have as many labels as you set. In your first edit, changing a[0], you're updating one element of the single list that a, b, and c all refer to. In your second, changing e, you're switching e to be a label for a different object (4 instead of 3).