I've seen this notation used a lot, and I was wondering, is there is any notable difference between these two notations?
element#id { property: 0; }
and
element#id { property: 0px; }
I use property: 0px;
all the time, as I find it cleaner looking, but I'm not really sure if the browser interprets 0px
differently than 0
.
Does anyone know which one is better or correct?
Unit identifiers are optional, but there is no noted performance increase (although you are saving two characters).
CSS2 - From W3C CSS 2.1 Specification for Syntax and basic data types:
The format of a length value (denoted by <length> in this specification) is a <number> (with or without a decimal point) immediately followed by a unit identifier (e.g., px, em, etc.). After a zero length, the unit identifier is optional.
(Emphasis mine)
CSS3 - From W3C CSS Values and Units Module Level 3 (Currently in Candidate Recommendation at the time of this writing)
For zero lengths the unit identifier is optional (i.e. can be syntactically represented as the 0).
While the unit is optional when the value is 0
, I tend to leave it in, as I can then tweak the values with Chrome's Developer Tools by clicking on the value and pressing the up/down arrow keys. Without a unit, that isn't really possible.
Also, CSS minifiers strip the units off of 0
values anyways, so it won't really matter in the end.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With