I'm currently delving into Fortran and I've come across the pure
keyword specifying functions/subroutines that have no side effects.
I have a book, Fortran 90/95 by S Chapman which introduces the pure
keyword but strangely provides no "good coding practice" uses.
I'm wondering how liberally one should use this keyword in their procedures. Just by looking around it's obvious to me that most procedures without side effects don't find it necessary to include the pure
keyword.
So where is it best used? Only in procedures one wants to completely guarantee have no side effects? Or perhaps in procedures one plans to convert to elemental
procedures later? (As elemental
procedures must first be pure
.)
Fortran procedures can be specified as PURE, meaning that there is no chance that the procedure would have any side effect on data outside the procedure. Only pure procedures can be used in specification expressions. The PURE keyword must be used in the procedure declaration.
A pure function is a function where the return value is only determined by its input values, without observable side effects. This is how functions in math work: Math. cos(x) will, for the same value of x , always return the same result. Computing it does not change x .
PURE
is required in some cases - for example, procedures called within specification expressions or from FORALL
or DO CONCURRENT
constructs. PURE
is required in these case to give the Fortran processor flexibility in the ordering of procedure invocations while still having a reasonably deterministic outcome from a particular stretch of code.
Beyond those required cases, whether to use PURE
or not is basically a question of style, which is somewhat subjective.
There are costs to use of PURE
(inability to do IO within the procedure, inability to call procedures that are not PURE
) and benefits (a pure procedure written today can be called from a context written tomorrow that requires a pure procedure, because PURE
procedures have no side effects the implications of an invocation of such a procedure may be clearer to a reader of the code), the trade-off between the two depends on specifics.
The standard may give Fortran processors considerable lee-way in how they evaluate expressions and function references within expressions. It definitely constrains programs in some ways around side effects of function execution and modification of function arguments. The requirements on a pure function are consistent with that lee-way and those constraints, consequently some people use a style where most functions are pure. Again, it may still depend on specifics, and exceptions may have to exist for things like C interoperability or interaction with external API's.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With