I'm trying to prove some simple things about a function which uses decidable equality. Here is a much simplified example:
open import Relation.Nullary
open import Relation.Binary
open import Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality
module Foo {c} {ℓ} (ds : DecSetoid c ℓ) where
open DecSetoid ds hiding (refl)
data Result : Set where
something something-else : Result
check : Carrier → Carrier → Result
check x y with x ≟ y
... | yes _ = something
... | no _ = something-else
Now, I'm trying to prove something like this where I've already shown that both sides of the _≟_
are identical.
check-same : ∀ x → check x x ≡ something
check-same x = {!!}
At this point, the current goal is (check ds x x | x ≟ x) ≡ something
. If the x ≟ x
was by itself, I would solve it by using something like refl
, but in this situation the best I can come up with is something like this:
check-same x with x ≟ x
... | yes p = refl
... | no ¬p with ¬p (DecSetoid.refl ds)
... | ()
By itself this isn't that bad, but in the middle of a larger proof it's a mess. Surely there must be a better way to do this?
Since my function, like the one in the example, doesn't care about the proof object returned by x ≟ y
, I was able to replace it with ⌊ x ≟ y ⌋
which returns a boolean.
That allowed me write this lemma
≟-refl : ∀ x → ⌊ x ≟ x ⌋ ≡ true
≟-refl x with x ≟ x
... | yes p = refl
... | no ¬p = ⊥-elim (¬p (DecSetoid.refl ds))
which I could then use with rewrite
to simplify my proof to
check-same x rewrite ≟-refl x = refl
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With