I was wondering if it is indirectly possible to have a trigger executed just before the transaction is about to commit? In this trigger, I will do consistency checks and rollback the transaction if required.
For example, I have three tables:
users (id, name)
groups (id, name)
user_in_group (user_id, group_id)
I would like to create a trigger which verifies that a user is always part of a group. No orphan users are allowed. Each time an insert into users occurs, this trigger will verify that a correspondering insert into user_in_group also occured. If not, the transaction will not commit.
This cannot be done using a simple row- or statement- based trigger, since the above scenario requires two separate statements.
The other way around, when a delete from user_in_group happens, can be easily done by a row-based trigger.
All PostgreSQL triggers execute in the same transaction as the transaction that has triggered them. Edit: You can also use LISTEN + NOTIFY to send a message from your trigger to a code that executes outside of the transaction.
A PostgreSQL trigger is a function called automatically whenever an event such as an insert, update, or deletion occurs. A PostgreSQL trigger can be defined to fire in the following cases: Before attempting any operation on a row (before constraints are checked and the INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE is attempted).
The default value of commit is ON in PostgreSQL, which means we need not have to execute a commit statement to save the transaction; it will automatically save the transaction into the database. If we set auto-commit is off, then we need to write commit to save the transaction into the database.
Triggers on Events. PL/pgSQL can be used to define trigger functions on data changes or database events. A trigger function is created with the CREATE FUNCTION command, declaring it as a function with no arguments and a return type of trigger (for data change triggers) or event_trigger (for database event triggers).
Did you look into the CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER, with the DEFERRABLE (INITIALLY DEFERRED)
option?
Wouldn't the correct method really be to establish constraints into the database? That seems exactly what constraints are for. Add a foreign key constraint and a not null and it would seem you should be in business.
Now revised for symmetrical constraints:
drop table foousers cascade;
drop table foogroups cascade;
drop table foousergrps cascade;
create table foousers (id int primary key, name text);
create table foogroups (id int primary key, name text);
create table foousergrps (user_id int unique references foousers not null, group_id int unique references foogroups not null);
alter table foogroups add foreign key (id) references foousergrps (group_id) deferrable initially deferred;
alter table foousers add foreign key (id) references foousergrps (user_id) deferrable initially deferred;
begin;
insert into foousers values (0, 'root');
insert into foousers values (1, 'daemon');
insert into foogroups values (0, 'wheel');
insert into foogroups values (1, 'daemon');
insert into foousergrps values (0,0);
insert into foousergrps values (1,1);
commit;
Forbidden:
insert into foousers values (2, 'bad');
insert into foousergrps values (2,2);
Example of (non-deferrable, boo) check function:
create table foousergrps (user_id int unique references foousers not null, group_id int not null);
create function fooorphangroupcheck(int) returns boolean as $$
declare
gid alias for $1;
begin
perform 1 from foousergrps where group_id = gid limit 1;
if NOT FOUND then return false;
end if;
return true;
end;
$$
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
alter table foogroups add check (fooorphangroupcheck(id));
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With